• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

减少药物不良事件:来自突破性系列协作的经验教训。

Reducing adverse drug events: lessons from a breakthrough series collaborative.

作者信息

Leape L L, Kabcenell A I, Gandhi T K, Carver P, Nolan T W, Berwick D M

机构信息

Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02115, USA.

出版信息

Jt Comm J Qual Improv. 2000 Jun;26(6):321-31. doi: 10.1016/s1070-3241(00)26026-4.

DOI:10.1016/s1070-3241(00)26026-4
PMID:10840664
Abstract

BACKGROUND

In January 1996, 38 hospitals and health care organizations (for a total of 40 hospitals) in the United States came together in an Institute for Healthcare Improvement (IHI; Boston) Breakthrough Series collaborative to reduce adverse drug events-injuries related to the use or nonuse of medications.

METHODS

The participants were taught the Model for Improvement, a method for rapid-cycle change and evaluation, and were then coached on how to identify their own problem areas and develop changes in practice for rapid-cycle testing. These changes could be implementation of one or more known medication error prevention practices or new practices developed.

RESULTS

During a 15-month period the 40 hospitals conducted a total of 739 tests of changes. Process changes accounted for 63% of the cycles; the remainder consisted of preliminary data gathering, consensus-building, or education cycles. Eight types of changes were implemented by seven or more hospitals, with a success rate of 70%. These changes included non-punitive reporting, ensuring documentation of allergy information, standardizing medication administration times, and implementing chemotherapy protocols.

DISCUSSION

Success in making significant changes was associated with strong leadership, effective processes, and appropriate choice of intervention. Successful teams were able to define, clearly state, and relentlessly pursue their aims, and then chose practical interventions and moved early into changing a process. They did not spend months collecting data before beginning a change. Changes that were most successful were those that attempted to change processes, not people. Health care organizations committed to patient safety need not regard current performance limits as inevitable.

摘要

背景

1996年1月,美国38家医院和医疗保健机构(共40家医院)共同参与了医疗改进研究所(IHI;波士顿)的突破系列协作项目,以减少药物不良事件——与用药或未用药相关的伤害。

方法

参与者学习了改进模型,这是一种快速循环变革与评估的方法,随后接受指导,了解如何识别自身问题领域并制定实践变革以进行快速循环测试。这些变革可以是实施一种或多种已知的预防用药错误措施,也可以是开发新措施。

结果

在15个月期间,40家医院共进行了739次变革测试。流程变革占循环次数的63%;其余包括初步数据收集、达成共识或教育循环。七种或更多医院实施了八种变革,成功率为70%。这些变革包括非惩罚性报告、确保过敏信息记录、规范用药时间以及实施化疗方案。

讨论

成功做出重大变革与强有力的领导、有效的流程以及恰当的干预选择相关。成功的团队能够明确界定、清晰阐述并坚定不移地追求其目标,然后选择切实可行的干预措施并尽早着手改变流程。他们在开始变革前没有花费数月时间收集数据。最成功的变革是那些试图改变流程而非人的变革。致力于患者安全的医疗保健机构不必将当前的绩效限制视为不可避免。

相似文献

1
Reducing adverse drug events: lessons from a breakthrough series collaborative.减少药物不良事件:来自突破性系列协作的经验教训。
Jt Comm J Qual Improv. 2000 Jun;26(6):321-31. doi: 10.1016/s1070-3241(00)26026-4.
2
Reducing medication errors in hospitals: a peer review organization collaboration.
Jt Comm J Qual Improv. 2000 Jun;26(6):332-40. doi: 10.1016/s1070-3241(00)26027-6.
3
Using an improvement model to reduce adverse drug events in VA facilities.运用改进模型减少退伍军人事务部医疗机构中的药物不良事件。
Jt Comm J Qual Improv. 2001 May;27(5):243-54. doi: 10.1016/s1070-3241(01)27021-7.
4
Changing hospital culture, systems reduces drug errors.
Exec Solut Healthc Manag. 1999 Apr;2(4):1, 4-9.
5
Improving medication safety across a multihospital system.提高多医院系统中的用药安全性。
Jt Comm J Qual Improv. 2001 Mar;27(3):123-37. doi: 10.1016/s1070-3241(01)27012-6.
6
Creating a culture of medication administration safety: laying the foundation for computerized provider order entry.营造用药安全文化:为计算机化医嘱录入奠定基础。
Jt Comm J Qual Improv. 2002 Jul;28(7):396-402. doi: 10.1016/s1070-3241(02)28039-6.
7
Improving medication administration error reporting systems. Why do errors occur?改进用药错误报告系统。错误为何会发生?
Ambul Outreach. 2000 Spring:16-20.
8
10 targets for reducing adverse drug events. Institute for Healthcare Improvement.减少药物不良事件的10个目标。医疗改进研究所。
Qual Lett Healthc Lead. 1999 Mar;11(3):13-25.
9
Errors prevented by and associated with bar-code medication administration systems.条码给药系统预防及与之相关的差错
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2007 May;33(5):293-301, 245. doi: 10.1016/s1553-7250(07)33034-1.
10
A multidisciplinary team approach to reducing medication variance.
Jt Comm J Qual Improv. 2002 Jul;28(7):403-9. doi: 10.1016/s1070-3241(02)28040-2.

引用本文的文献

1
The role of QI collaboratives in neonatology.质量改进协作组在新生儿学中的作用。
J Perinatol. 2025 Apr;45(4):417-425. doi: 10.1038/s41372-024-02124-w. Epub 2024 Oct 9.
2
Reporting Antimicrobial-Related Adverse Drug Events in Jordan: An Analysis from the VigiBase Database.约旦抗菌药物相关药品不良事件报告:来自VigiBase数据库的分析
Antibiotics (Basel). 2023 Mar 21;12(3):624. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics12030624.
3
Challenges in Implementing Treat-to-Target Strategies in Rheumatology.实现风湿学目标治疗策略的挑战。
Rheum Dis Clin North Am. 2019 Feb;45(1):101-112. doi: 10.1016/j.rdc.2018.09.007.
4
Exploring the potential of a multi-level approach to improve capability for continuous organizational improvement and learning in a Swedish healthcare region.探索一种多层次方法在瑞典一个医疗保健区域提高持续组织改进和学习能力方面的潜力。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 May 24;18(1):376. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3129-3.
5
Implementation of Treat-to-Target in Rheumatoid Arthritis Through a Learning Collaborative: Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial.通过学习合作实现类风湿关节炎的达标治疗:一项随机对照试验的结果。
Arthritis Rheumatol. 2017 Jul;69(7):1374-1380. doi: 10.1002/art.40111. Epub 2017 May 31.
6
Implementation of treat-to-target in rheumatoid arthritis through a Learning Collaborative: Rationale and design of the TRACTION trial.通过学习协作组在类风湿关节炎中实施达标治疗:TRACTION试验的原理与设计
Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2016 Aug;46(1):81-7. doi: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2016.02.009. Epub 2016 Mar 8.
7
What is the role of individual accountability in patient safety? A multi-site ethnographic study.个人问责制在患者安全中扮演着怎样的角色?一项多地点人种学研究。
Sociol Health Illn. 2016 Feb;38(2):216-32. doi: 10.1111/1467-9566.12370. Epub 2015 Nov 4.
8
Pursuing the Triple Aim: The First 7 Years.追求三重目标:头七年
Milbank Q. 2015 Jun;93(2):263-300. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12122.
9
Developing a dashboard to help measure and achieve the triple aim: a population-based cohort study.开发一个仪表板以帮助衡量并实现三重目标:一项基于人群的队列研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Aug 30;14:363. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-14-363.
10
Clinical errors and medical negligence.临床差错和医疗事故。
Med Princ Pract. 2013;22(4):323-33. doi: 10.1159/000346296. Epub 2013 Jan 18.