Suppr超能文献

乳腺X线片中皮肤边缘的感知:两种增感屏-胶片组合的比较

Skin edge perception in mammograms: a comparison of two film-screen combinations.

作者信息

Meeson S, Young K C, Cooke J

机构信息

Department of Medical Physics, Royal Surrey County Hospital, Guildford, UK.

出版信息

Br J Radiol. 2000 Apr;73(868):370-5. doi: 10.1259/bjr.73.868.10844862.

Abstract

The entire skin edge is not always seen on mammograms. The importance of demonstrating the full extent of the breast on a mammogram is uncertain, but there are implications for optimizing film design and use. The new Agfa HDR film has been designed to improve visualization of the skin edge without compromising overall contrast. A quantitative and qualitative comparison between Agfa HDR and the Fuji UMMA film has been performed. A total of 216 mammograms from 54 symptomatic women were analysed. For each view on each woman, one breast was imaged using Fuji UMMA film and the other using Agfa HDR film. The target density achieved on quality control films of PMMA blocks was 1.70 +/- 0.10 for both film types. A radiologist graded the skin edges of all the films as visible, just visible or dark. Measurements were made of the optical densities in the skin edge region and on the fully exposed black part of the film, adjacent to the skin line. 70% of the HDR films had visible skin edges compared with 43% of the UMMA films. 2% of the HDR films had dark skin edges compared with 26% of the UMMA films. Optical densities at the skin edge were broadly similar for the two films and in the range 3.6 +/- 0.3. However, the density of the black part of the Agfa film was about 0.5 higher than with the Fuji film and it appears that this was the main reason the skin edge region was better visualized with the Agfa film.

摘要

在乳房X光片中并非总能看到整个皮肤边缘。在乳房X光片中显示乳房全貌的重要性尚不确定,但这对优化胶片设计和使用有一定影响。新的爱克发HDR胶片旨在改善皮肤边缘的可视化效果,同时不影响整体对比度。已对爱克发HDR胶片和富士UMMA胶片进行了定量和定性比较。对54名有症状女性的216张乳房X光片进行了分析。对于每位女性的每个视图,一侧乳房使用富士UMMA胶片成像,另一侧使用爱克发HDR胶片成像。两种胶片在PMMA块的质量控制胶片上达到的目标密度均为1.70±0.10。一位放射科医生将所有胶片的皮肤边缘分级为可见、勉强可见或暗。对皮肤边缘区域以及胶片上与皮肤线相邻的完全曝光黑色部分的光学密度进行了测量。70%的HDR胶片皮肤边缘可见,而UMMA胶片为43%。2%的HDR胶片皮肤边缘暗,而UMMA胶片为26%。两种胶片在皮肤边缘的光学密度大致相似,范围为3.6±0.3。然而,爱克发胶片黑色部分的密度比富士胶片高约0.5,这似乎是爱克发胶片能更好地显示皮肤边缘区域的主要原因。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验