Farmer R D, Lawrenson R A, Todd J C, Williams T J, MacRae K D, Tyrer F, Leydon G M
European Institute of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Surrey, Surrey Research Park. Guildford. GU2 5RF, London.
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2000 Jun;49(6):580-90. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2125.2000.00198.x.
In October 1995 in response to the results of three studies, the Committee on the Safety of Medicines advised doctors and pharmacists that oral contraceptives containing desogestrel (DSG) and gestodene (GST) were associated with around a two-fold increase in the risk of thromboembolism compared with those containing other progestogens. The objective of this study was to estimate the risk of idiopathic venous thromboembolic disease (VTE) in users of combined oral contraceptives (COCs), to compare the risk between formulations and to examine the effect of using age banding as opposed to matching by exact year of birth.
A nested case control study was conducted using the General Practice Research Database. Women with a VTE event recorded between 1992 and 1997, who were treated with an anticoagulant, from consideration of their prescription records were likely to have been using a COC prescription on the day of the event and also had no exclusion factors, were deemed cases. For comparison with the previous studies, two nested case control studies were undertaken. Study 1 used controls matched by practice and year of birth. Study 2 used controls matched by practice and within 5 years age bands.
We found an incidence of idiopathic VTE amongst users of combined oral contraceptives of 3.8 per 10 000 exposed women years. Incidence rates increased markedly after 35 years of age. The nested case-control study using controls matched by year of birth showed no significant difference in risk between the major COC formulations. With levonorgestrel (LNG) 150 microgram and ethinyloestradiol (EE) 30 microgram as the reference, the adjusted ORs for GST 75 microgram and EE 30 microgram was 1.3 (95% CI 0.8, 2.1), for DSG 150 microgram and EE 30 microgram it was 1.0 (95% CI 0.7, 1.7) and for DSG 150 microgram and EE 20 microgram it was 0.8 (95% CI 0.4, 1.6). Using less rigorous matching criteria, matching controls to cases within 5 years age bands, the ORs increased. When a mixed group of COCs, characterized by having LNG as the progestogen component was used as the reference category, there was an elevation in the ORs for the newer products. We found a significant association between idiopathic VTE and current smoking (OR 2.0 (1.4, 2.7)), BMI over 35 (OR 3.8 (1.8, 8.0)) and asthma (OR 1.9 (1.3, 2.9)). The OR for women who had proxy evidence of general ill health (indicated by the number of prescriptions issued) was 2.2 (1.7, 3.7).
The results of this study indicate that a number of the characteristics of the women taking COCs affect the risk of VTE. There is no evidence to support the hypothesis that there is any difference in risk between COC formulations containing under 50 microg ethinyloestradiol.
1995年10月,针对三项研究结果,药品安全委员会建议医生和药剂师,与含其他孕激素的口服避孕药相比,含去氧孕烯(DSG)和孕二烯酮(GST)的口服避孕药使血栓栓塞风险增加了约两倍。本研究的目的是评估复方口服避孕药(COC)使用者发生特发性静脉血栓栓塞性疾病(VTE)的风险,比较不同配方之间的风险,并研究采用年龄分组而非按确切出生年份匹配的效果。
利用全科医疗研究数据库进行一项巢式病例对照研究。1992年至1997年间记录有VTE事件且接受抗凝治疗的女性,根据其处方记录,在事件发生当日可能正在使用COC处方且无排除因素,被视为病例。为与之前的研究进行比较,开展了两项巢式病例对照研究。研究1采用按诊所和出生年份匹配的对照。研究2采用按诊所和5岁年龄组匹配的对照。
我们发现复方口服避孕药使用者中特发性VTE的发病率为每10000名暴露女性年3.8例。35岁以后发病率显著上升。采用按出生年份匹配对照的巢式病例对照研究显示,主要COC配方之间的风险无显著差异。以左炔诺孕酮(LNG)150微克和炔雌醇(EE)30微克为参照,GST 75微克和EE 30微克的校正比值比为1.3(95%可信区间0.8,2.1),DSG 150微克和EE 30微克为1.0(95%可信区间0.7,1.7),DSG 150微克和EE 20微克为0.8(95%可信区间0.4,1.6)。采用不太严格的匹配标准,即按5岁年龄组将对照与病例匹配,比值比增加。当以含LNG作为孕激素成分的混合COC组作为参照类别时,新产品的比值比升高。我们发现特发性VTE与当前吸烟(比值比2.0(1.4,2.7))、BMI超过35(比值比3.8(1.8,8.0))和哮喘(比值比1.9(1.3,2.9))之间存在显著关联。有一般健康状况不佳替代证据(以开出的处方数量表示)的女性的比值比为2.2(1.7,3.7)。
本研究结果表明服用COC的女性的一些特征会影响VTE风险。没有证据支持含50微克以下炔雌醇的COC配方之间风险存在差异的假设。