• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

3至6年时隧道修复的效果。

Performance of tunnel restorations at 3-6 years.

作者信息

Nicolaisen S, von der Fehr F R, Lunder N, Thomsen I

机构信息

Buskerud Public Dental Health Service, Kongsberg, Norway.

出版信息

J Dent. 2000 Aug;28(6):383-7. doi: 10.1016/s0300-5712(00)00024-5.

DOI:10.1016/s0300-5712(00)00024-5
PMID:10856801
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

the purpose of this study was to evaluate the success of the tunnel restoration method in the Norwegian public dental service.

METHODS

all patients from three age cohorts (born 1975-1977) who had received one or more tunnel restorations at least 3 years earlier, at the public dental clinic in Kongsberg and a neighboring clinic in Numedal, were examined clinically and radiographically by two calibrated dentists. Individuals with two or more filled surfaces per year were classified as "caries active". The statistical analyses consisted of non-parametric Kaplan-Meyer estimates of the survival function, and rank tests for associations to the longevity data and the background variables.

RESULTS

a total of 182 restorations in 94 patients were studied. Sixty-five percent of the restorations were considered successful. A total of 118 restorations were censored within the 76-month observation period. The median survival time was estimated to be 55 months, with a 95% confidence interval of 51-61 months. About 90% survived 3 years, while only 35% survived 5 years. Both caries activity and operator had significant effects on the survival period. On the other hand, there was no difference between "wells" and "tunnels", tooth type, tooth surface or jaw with regard to success rate.

CONCLUSIONS

The tunnel preparation filled with currently available glass-ionomer cement is not a generally favorable alternative in primary approximal lesions. However, in the hands of a well-trained, careful operator it may be chosen as a semi-permanent solution for patients with modest caries activity.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估挪威公共牙科服务中隧道修复方法的成功率。

方法

对来自三个年龄组(出生于1975 - 1977年)的所有患者进行临床和影像学检查,这些患者至少在3年前于孔斯贝格的公共牙科诊所及努梅达尔的一家邻近诊所接受了一次或多次隧道修复,由两名经过校准的牙医进行检查。每年有两个或更多充填面的个体被归类为“龋活跃”。统计分析包括生存函数的非参数Kaplan - Meyer估计,以及与寿命数据和背景变量关联的秩检验。

结果

共研究了94例患者的182次修复。65%的修复被认为是成功的。在76个月的观察期内,共有118次修复被截尾。中位生存时间估计为55个月,95%置信区间为51 - 61个月。约90%的修复存活3年,而只有35%存活5年。龋活性和操作人员对生存期均有显著影响。另一方面,“窝洞”和“隧道”、牙型、牙面或颌骨在成功率方面没有差异。

结论

用目前可用的玻璃离子水门汀充填的隧道预备在乳牙邻面病变中并非普遍有利的选择。然而,在训练有素、操作仔细的操作人员手中,对于龋活性中等的患者,它可能被选为一种半永久性的解决方案。

相似文献

1
Performance of tunnel restorations at 3-6 years.3至6年时隧道修复的效果。
J Dent. 2000 Aug;28(6):383-7. doi: 10.1016/s0300-5712(00)00024-5.
2
Restorative treatment decisions on approximal caries in Norway.挪威关于邻面龋修复治疗的决策
Int Dent J. 1999 Jun;49(3):165-72. doi: 10.1002/j.1875-595x.1999.tb00902.x.
3
Accuracy of radiographic detection of residual caries in connection with tunnel restorations.与隧道修复相关的残余龋损的影像学检测准确性
Caries Res. 1998;32(1):17-22. doi: 10.1159/000016425.
4
Randomized clinical trial of adhesive restorations in primary molars. 18-month results.乳牙粘结修复的随机临床试验。18个月的结果。
Am J Dent. 2013 Dec;26(6):351-5.
5
A 3-year clinical study of tunnel restorations.隧道修复体的3年临床研究。
Eur J Oral Sci. 1996 Aug;104(4 ( Pt 1)):384-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0722.1996.tb00096.x.
6
ART restorations and glass ionomer sealants in Zimbabwe: survival after 3 years.津巴布韦的抗逆转录病毒治疗修复和玻璃离子封闭剂:3年后的留存情况
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1998 Dec;26(6):372-81. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0528.1998.tb01975.x.
7
A two-year comparison of resin-based composite tunnel and Class II restorations in a randomized controlled trial.一项随机对照试验中树脂基复合树脂隧道修复和Ⅱ类洞修复的两年比较。
Am J Dent. 2004 Aug;17(4):253-6.
8
Clinical evaluation of glass-ionomer tunnel restorations in primary molars: 36 months results.乳牙玻璃离子洞形修复体的临床评估:36个月的结果
Aust Dent J. 2008 Mar;53(1):41-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1834-7819.2007.00007.x.
9
Tunnel restorations. A 3 1/2-year follow up study of Class I and II tunnel restorations in permanent and primary teeth.
Swed Dent J. 1993;17(5):173-82.
10
Two-year results with box-only resin composite restorations.仅使用盒状树脂复合材料修复体的两年期结果。
ASDC J Dent Child. 1995 Nov-Dec;62(6):395-400.

引用本文的文献

1
Adoption of minimally invasive dentistry in Palestine: assessing practices and barriers - a cross-sectional study.巴勒斯坦微创牙科的应用:评估实践与障碍——一项横断面研究
BMC Oral Health. 2025 Oct 14;25(1):1624. doi: 10.1186/s12903-025-07042-7.
2
Tunnel Restoration: A Minimally Invasive Dentistry Practice.根管修复:一种微创牙科治疗方法。
Clin Cosmet Investig Dent. 2022 Jul 15;14:207-216. doi: 10.2147/CCIDE.S372165. eCollection 2022.
3
Class II resin composite restorations-tunnel vs. box-only in vitro and in vivo.II 类树脂复合材料修复体——管腔型与盒状型的体外与体内比较。
Clin Oral Investig. 2021 Feb;25(2):737-744. doi: 10.1007/s00784-020-03649-y. Epub 2020 Nov 9.
4
Minimally Invasive Intervention for Primary Caries Lesions: Are Dentists Implementing This Concept?微创介入治疗原发性龋损:牙医是否在实施这一理念?
Caries Res. 2019;53(2):204-216. doi: 10.1159/000490626. Epub 2018 Aug 14.
5
Restoring proximal caries lesions conservatively with tunnel restorations.采用隧道修复术保守修复近端龋损。
Clin Cosmet Investig Dent. 2013 Jul 30;5:43-50. doi: 10.2147/CCIDE.S48567.
6
Tunnel or saucer-shaped restorations: a survival analysis.洞形或碟形修复体:一项生存分析
Clin Oral Investig. 2005 Dec;9(4):233-8. doi: 10.1007/s00784-005-0011-6. Epub 2005 Aug 23.