Marson D C, Sawrie S M, Snyder S, McInturff B, Stalvey T, Boothe A, Aldridge T, Chatterjee A, Harrell L E
Department of Neurology, University of Alabama at Birmingham School of Medicine, 625 19th St S, 1216 Jefferson Tower, Birmingham, AL 35233-7340, USA.
Arch Neurol. 2000 Jun;57(6):877-84. doi: 10.1001/archneur.57.6.877.
To investigate financial capacity in patients with Alzheimer disease (AD) using a new theoretical model and prototype psychometric instrument.
Cross-sectional comparisons of older control subjects (n=23) and patients with mild (n=30) and moderate AD (n=20).
Financial capacity was measured using the Financial Capacity Instrument, a prototype psychometric instrument that tests financial capacity using 14 tasks of financial ability comprising 6 clinically relevant domains of financial activity: basic monetary skills, financial conceptual knowledge, cash transactions, checkbook management, bank statement management, and financial judgment.
The Financial Capacity Instrument tasks and domains showed adequate to excellent internal, interrater, and test-retest reliabilities. At the task level, patients with mild AD performed equivalently with controls on simple tasks such as counting coins/currency and conducting a 1-item grocery purchase, but significantly below controls on more complex tasks such as using a checkbook/register and understanding and using a bank statement. At the domain level, patients with mild AD performed significantly below controls on all domains except basic monetary skills. Patients with moderate AD performed significantly below controls and patients with mild AD on all tasks and domains. Regarding capacity status outcomes (capable, marginally capable, incapable) on domains, patients with mild AD had high proportions of marginally capable or incapable outcomes (range, 47%-87%), particularly on difficult domains like bank statement management (domain 5) and financial judgment (domain 6), but variability in individual outcomes. Patients with moderate AD had almost exclusively incapable outcomes across the 6 domains (range, 90%-100%).
Financial capacity is already significantly impaired in mild AD. Patients with mild AD demonstrate deficits in more complex financial abilities and impairment in most financial activities. Patients with moderate AD demonstrate severe impairment of all financial abilities and activities. The Financial Capacity Instrument has promise as an instrument for assessing domain-level financial activities and task-specific financial abilities in patients with dementia. Arch Neurol. 2000.
使用一种新的理论模型和心理测量原型工具,调查阿尔茨海默病(AD)患者的理财能力。
对老年对照受试者(n = 23)、轻度AD患者(n = 30)和中度AD患者(n = 20)进行横断面比较。
使用理财能力工具测量理财能力,该工具是一种心理测量原型工具,通过14项理财能力任务测试理财能力,这些任务涵盖6个临床相关的理财活动领域:基本货币技能、理财概念知识、现金交易、支票簿管理、银行对账单管理和理财判断。
理财能力工具的任务和领域显示出良好到出色的内部信度、评分者间信度和重测信度。在任务层面,轻度AD患者在诸如数硬币/货币以及进行单项杂货购买等简单任务上的表现与对照受试者相当,但在诸如使用支票簿/登记簿以及理解和使用银行对账单等更复杂任务上的表现显著低于对照受试者。在领域层面,轻度AD患者在除基本货币技能外的所有领域的表现均显著低于对照受试者。中度AD患者在所有任务和领域的表现均显著低于对照受试者以及轻度AD患者。关于领域层面的能力状态结果(有能力、勉强有能力、无能力),轻度AD患者有很高比例的勉强有能力或无能力结果(范围为47% - 87%),尤其是在诸如银行对账单管理(领域5)和理财判断(领域6)等困难领域,但个体结果存在差异。中度AD患者在6个领域几乎全部为无能力结果(范围为90% - 100%)。
轻度AD患者的理财能力已显著受损。轻度AD患者在更复杂的理财能力方面存在缺陷,并且大多数理财活动受到损害。中度AD患者的所有理财能力和活动均表现出严重受损。理财能力工具有望成为评估痴呆患者领域层面理财活动和特定任务理财能力的工具。《神经病学档案》。2000年。