Dupuis J, Van Eerdewegh P
Genome Therapeutics Corporation, Waltham, MA, 02453, USA.
Am J Hum Genet. 2000 Aug;67(2):462-75. doi: 10.1086/303008. Epub 2000 Jun 26.
Affected sibling pairs are often the design of choice in linkage-analysis studies with the goal of identifying the genes that increase susceptibility to complex diseases. Methods for multipoint analysis based on sibling amount of sharing that is identical by descent are widely available, for both autosomal and X-linked markers. Such methods have the advantage of making few assumptions about the mode of inheritance of the disease. However, with this approach, data from the pseudoautosomal regions on the X chromosome pose special challenges. Same-sex sibling pairs will share, in that region of the genome, more genetic material identical by descent, with and without the presence of a disease-susceptibility gene. This increased sharing will be more pronounced for markers closely linked to the sex-specific region. For the same reason, opposite-sex sibling pairs will share fewer alleles identical by descent. Failure to take this inequality in sharing into account may result in a false declaration of linkage if the study sample contains an excess of sex-concordant pairs, or a linkage may be missed when an excess of sex-discordant pairs is present. We propose a method to take into account this expected increase/decrease in sharing when markers in the pseudoautosomal region are analyzed. For quantitative traits, we demonstrate, using the Haseman-Elston method, (1) the same inflation in type I error, in the absence of an appropriate correction, and (2) the inadequacy of permutation tests to estimate levels of significance when all phenotypic values are permuted, irrespective of gender. The proposed method is illustrated with a genome screen on 350 sibling pairs affected with type I diabetes.
在旨在识别增加复杂疾病易感性基因的连锁分析研究中,受累同胞对往往是首选的研究设计。基于同源相同的同胞共享量进行多点分析的方法广泛适用于常染色体和X连锁标记。此类方法的优点是对疾病的遗传模式假设较少。然而,采用这种方法时,X染色体上拟常染色体区域的数据带来了特殊挑战。同性别的同胞对在基因组的该区域会共享更多同源相同的遗传物质,无论是否存在疾病易感基因。对于与性别特异性区域紧密连锁的标记,这种增加的共享会更加明显。出于同样的原因,异性同胞对将共享较少的同源相同等位基因。如果研究样本中同性别的同胞对过多,未能考虑到这种共享不平等可能会导致错误地宣布连锁关系;而当异性同胞对过多时,则可能会遗漏连锁关系。我们提出了一种在分析拟常染色体区域的标记时考虑这种预期共享增加/减少的方法。对于数量性状,我们使用哈斯曼 - 埃尔斯顿方法证明:(1)在没有适当校正的情况下,I型错误同样会膨胀;(2)当所有表型值都被置换而不考虑性别的情况下,置换检验不足以估计显著性水平。通过对350对患I型糖尿病的同胞对进行全基因组筛选来说明所提出的方法。