Moure-Eraso R
Department of Work Environment, University of Massachusetts, Lowell 01854, USA.
J Public Health Policy. 1999;20(3):310-8.
The reorganization of a Labor Caucus in APHA provides an opportunity to reflect on the community of methods and interests between the public health and labor communities. The nature of both movements is examined and the factors (knowledge base, political will, and social strategy) that define the actions of both movements are addressed. The antagonism between the prevailing political dogma of market individualism and the two movements is also discussed, with special emphasis of the need for strong government involvement to support the functioning of both labor and public health. Important issues that currently affect labor and public health are discussed. Constructive disagreements on policy choices of labor on national health insurance and occupational safety and health are examined. A warm endorsement of a critical alliance of labor and public health is made, and the revitalization of a labor caucus is cordially welcomed.
美国公共卫生协会(APHA)劳工核心小组的重组提供了一个契机,来反思公共卫生界与劳工界在方法和利益上的共同体。本文考察了这两个运动的性质,并探讨了界定这两个运动行动的因素(知识基础、政治意愿和社会战略)。文中还讨论了盛行的市场个人主义政治教条与这两个运动之间的对立,特别强调了政府大力介入以支持劳工和公共卫生运作的必要性。本文讨论了当前影响劳工和公共卫生的重要问题。审视了在国家医疗保险以及职业安全与健康等劳工政策选择上存在的建设性分歧。本文热情支持劳工与公共卫生结成关键联盟,并诚挚欢迎劳工核心小组的振兴。