Bolton D, Raven P, Madronal-Luque R, Marks I M
Department of Psychology, Institute of Psychiatry, De Crespigny Park, Denmark Hill, London, UK.
Behav Res Ther. 2000 Jul;38(7):695-708. doi: 10.1016/s0005-7967(99)00139-4.
The main aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that neurological soft signs and neuropsychological abnormalities associated with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) predict poor response to behavioural treatment. The design permitted investigation of secondary hypotheses, regarding correlations among these neurological markers and levels of symptomatology, and their stability in relation to changes in levels of symptomatology. Thirty-five participants satisfying DSM-IV diagnostic criteria for OCD were assessed pre- and postbehavioural treatment using a scaled measure of symptom severity, and a battery of tests sensitive to neuropsychological deficits associated with OCD. Eighteen of the participants were also assessed on an inventory of neurological soft signs. Neither neuropsychological test deficits nor neurological soft signs pretreatment predicted response to behavioural treatment. Lower performance on neuropsychological tasks and symptom severity were both significantly correlated with levels of soft signs. Some neurological markers were less severe posttreatment, but these changes were not related to treatment response.
与强迫症(OCD)相关的神经软体征和神经心理学异常预示着行为治疗效果不佳。该设计允许对次要假设进行研究,这些假设涉及这些神经学标志物与症状学水平之间的相关性,以及它们相对于症状学水平变化的稳定性。35名符合DSM-IV强迫症诊断标准的参与者在行为治疗前后,使用症状严重程度的量表测量以及一系列对与强迫症相关的神经心理学缺陷敏感的测试进行评估。其中18名参与者还接受了神经软体征清单评估。神经心理学测试缺陷和治疗前的神经软体征均不能预测行为治疗的反应。神经心理学任务表现较低和症状严重程度均与软体征水平显著相关。一些神经学标志物在治疗后不那么严重,但这些变化与治疗反应无关。