Busaba N Y, Fabian R L
Department of Otolaryngology, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Boston 02114, USA.
Laryngoscope. 1999 Feb;109(2 Pt 1):212-5. doi: 10.1097/00005537-199902000-00008.
Quantify the extent of lymphadenectomy achieved by the various modifications of neck dissection based on microscopic pathologic analysis.
Retrospective review of neck specimens of patients who underwent neck dissection for head and neck malignancies at our institution over a 5-year period.
Charts and pathology report findings on patients who underwent neck dissection were reviewed. Patients who received preoperative chemotherapy or radiation therapy to the neck were excluded. The number of lymph nodes documented by pathologic microscopic examination for each specimen was recorded.
There were 164 neck specimens on 135 patients (29 patient had simultaneous bilateral neck dissection). Those were divided into four groups based on the nonlymphatic structures preserved. There were 58 radical neck dissections (radical neck dissections) (group 1), 50 modified radical neck dissections sparing the eleventh cranial nerve (group 2), 15 modified radical neck dissections sparing the eleventh cranial nerve and internal jugular vein (group 3), and 33 modified radical neck dissections sparing the eleventh cranial nerve, internal jugular vein, and sternocleidomastoid muscle (group 4). The remaining 8 had other modifications of radical neck dissection. The mean number of lymph nodes found per specimen was 34 in group 1, 27 in group 2, 31 in group 3, and 22 in group 4. We performed one-way between-group analysis of variance (ANOVA). Pair-wise comparisons of means were carried out subsequent to ANOVA utilizing the Fisher Exact Test. Group 4 was significantly different from all other groups. Additionally, group 2 significantly differed from group 1.
The extent of lymphadenectomy achieved by neck dissection decreases as the number of nonlymphatic structures preserved in the neck increases. The impact of this finding on the pathologic staging or prognosis needs further analysis.
基于微观病理分析,量化通过各种颈部清扫改良术式所实现的淋巴结清扫范围。
回顾性分析我院5年间因头颈部恶性肿瘤接受颈部清扫术患者的颈部标本。
查阅接受颈部清扫术患者的病历及病理报告结果。排除术前接受颈部化疗或放疗的患者。记录每个标本经病理显微镜检查记录的淋巴结数量。
135例患者有164个颈部标本(29例患者同期行双侧颈部清扫)。根据保留的非淋巴结构将其分为四组。有58例根治性颈部清扫术(根治性颈部清扫组1),50例保留第十一脑神经的改良根治性颈部清扫术(组2),15例保留第十一脑神经和颈内静脉的改良根治性颈部清扫术(组3),以及33例保留第十一脑神经、颈内静脉和胸锁乳突肌的改良根治性颈部清扫术(组4)。其余8例有其他根治性颈部清扫改良术式。每组标本平均发现的淋巴结数量为:组1为34个,组2为27个,组3为31个,组4为22个。我们进行了组间单因素方差分析(ANOVA)。方差分析后利用Fisher精确检验进行均值的两两比较。组4与所有其他组有显著差异。此外,组2与组1有显著差异。
颈部清扫术实现的淋巴结清扫范围随着颈部保留的非淋巴结构数量增加而减少。这一发现对病理分期或预后的影响需要进一步分析。