Spiro R H, Strong E W, Shah J P
Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Am J Surg. 1994 Nov;168(5):415-8. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9610(05)80088-1.
Commencing in 1984, we initiated a head and neck service surgical database that included a classification system for neck dissection. The aim was to reduce the confusion in terminology resulting from growing interest in modifications of conventional radical neck dissection.
We considered a neck dissection as radical when four or five lymph node levels were excised; this included patients who had an otherwise classical neck dissection for supraglottic larynx or hypopharyngeal cancer sparing level 1. Lymph-node levels removed, nonlymphatic structures preserved, and excised nonlymphatic structures not ordinarily included in a classical radical neck dissection were all specified by the operating surgeon. We defined as a selective neck dissection any lymphadenectomy that encompassed no more than three nodal levels, usually supraomohyoid (levels 1, 2, 3), or jugular (levels 2, 3, 4). We defined as a limited neck dissection any lymphadenectomy that involved removal of no more than two nodal levels.
At the 10-year mark, this database of 10,650 patients now includes 2,635 lymphadenectomies in 2,426 patients, the precise extent of which is accurately described in each patient.
The current classification of neck dissection does not cover all possibilities. If we define as radical those lymphadenectomies that resect four or five nodal levels and specify structures preserved or additional nonlymphatic structures sacrificed, we allow for the possibility that some procedures may be both modified and extended. Selective would describe the standard, three-level dissections (eg, supraomohyoid or jugular node dissections), and the term limited would be introduced to indicate a neck dissection that involves removal of no more than two nodal levels. Such a three-tiered classification would more accurately reflect the time and effort involved and provide a more equitable basis for reimbursement.
自1984年起,我们建立了一个头颈外科手术数据库,其中包括颈部清扫的分类系统。目的是减少因对传统根治性颈部清扫术改良方法的兴趣增加而导致的术语混乱。
当切除四或五个淋巴结水平时,我们将颈部清扫视为根治性清扫;这包括那些对声门上喉癌或下咽癌进行经典颈部清扫但保留第一水平的患者。手术医生需明确切除的淋巴结水平、保留的非淋巴结构以及经典根治性颈部清扫中通常不包括的切除非淋巴结构。我们将任何不超过三个淋巴结水平的淋巴结切除术定义为选择性颈部清扫,通常是肩胛舌骨肌上(第1、2、3水平)或颈静脉(第2、3、4水平)清扫。我们将任何涉及不超过两个淋巴结水平切除的淋巴结切除术定义为局限性颈部清扫。
到第10年时,这个包含10650例患者的数据库现在包括2426例患者的2635例淋巴结切除术,每个患者的具体范围都有准确描述。
目前的颈部清扫分类并未涵盖所有可能性。如果我们将切除四或五个淋巴结水平的淋巴结切除术定义为根治性清扫,并明确保留的结构或额外牺牲的非淋巴结构,那么就存在一些手术可能既是改良的又是扩大的可能性。选择性可描述标准的三级清扫(例如肩胛舌骨肌上或颈静脉淋巴结清扫),引入“局限性”一词来表示涉及不超过两个淋巴结水平切除的颈部清扫。这样的三级分类将更准确地反映所涉及的时间和精力,并为报销提供更公平的基础。