Lazarus R S
Department of Psychology, University of California, Berkeley, USA.
Am Psychol. 2000 Jun;55(6):665-73. doi: 10.1037//0003-066x.55.6.665.
In commenting in considerable detail on the four main articles in the special section on stress and coping, the author comes to two main conclusions: First, there is an increasing amount of high quality research on stress and coping that suggests the field is finally maturing, and this research may help reduce the long-standing gap between research and clinical practice. Second, this research is increasingly using badly needed research designs that have not hitherto been sufficiently emphasized, such as longitudinal or prospective designs, focused on observations that are day-to-day, microanalytic, and in-depth, and that are compatible with a holistic outlook. The author also addresses the role of positive emotion in coping, the concept of defense as it is dealt with nowadays, and the task of evaluating coping efficacy.
在相当详细地评论关于压力与应对的专题部分中的四篇主要文章时，作者得出了两个主要结论：第一，有越来越多关于压力与应对的高质量研究，这表明该领域终于走向成熟，并且这项研究可能有助于缩小长期存在的研究与临床实践之间的差距。第二，这项研究越来越多地采用了迄今未得到充分重视但急需的研究设计，比如纵向或前瞻性设计，专注于日常的、微观分析的和深入的观察，并且与整体观相契合。作者还探讨了积极情绪在应对中的作用、当今所涉及的防御概念以及评估应对效果的任务。
