Furberg C D
Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27157-1063, USA.
Clin Cardiol. 2000 Jul;23(7 Suppl 4):IV15-9. doi: 10.1002/clc.4960230705.
Drugs grouped into a therapeutic class on the basis of a common mechanism of action often have considerably different pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties. Among angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, differences with potential clinical relevance include potency, whether the drug is an active compound or requires metabolic activation, lipophilicity, route(s) of elimination, and half-life. Large clinical trials have documented the clinical benefits of several ACE inhibitors in various patient populations, and many clinical effects of ACE inhibitors are likely to be the same. However, there are possible quantitative differences among ACE inhibitors that may alter the overall therapeutic benefits for specific patient populations and indications. Equipotency in terms of clinical efficacy is difficult to determine. Since the concept of "class effect" is a term of convenience that has no universally accepted definition and subsequently should not form the basis for the practice of evidence-based medicine, untested drugs of a "class" should be considered to be unproven drugs.
基于共同作用机制归类于同一治疗类别的药物,其药效学和药代动力学特性往往有很大差异。在血管紧张素转换酶(ACE)抑制剂中,具有潜在临床相关性的差异包括效力、药物是活性化合物还是需要代谢激活、亲脂性、消除途径以及半衰期。大型临床试验已证明几种ACE抑制剂在不同患者群体中的临床益处,并且ACE抑制剂的许多临床效果可能相同。然而,ACE抑制剂之间可能存在定量差异,这可能会改变特定患者群体和适应症的总体治疗益处。临床疗效方面的等效性难以确定。由于“类效应”这一概念是一个方便用语,没有普遍接受的定义,因此不应构成循证医学实践的基础,“类”中的未经测试的药物应被视为未经证实的药物。