• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Class effects and evidence-based medicine.类效应与循证医学。
Clin Cardiol. 2000 Jul;23(7 Suppl 4):IV15-9. doi: 10.1002/clc.4960230705.
2
Angiotensin II and trials of cardiovascular outcomes.血管紧张素II与心血管结局试验。
Am J Cardiol. 2002 Jan 24;89(2A):11A-16A; discussion 16A-17A. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(01)02322-0.
3
Are all angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors interchangeable?所有的血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂都可以互换吗?
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001 Apr;37(5):1456-60. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(01)01161-5.
4
Clinical pharmacokinetics of angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors in renal failure.血管紧张素转换酶(ACE)抑制剂在肾衰竭患者中的临床药代动力学
Clin Pharmacokinet. 1993 Mar;24(3):230-54. doi: 10.2165/00003088-199324030-00005.
5
Pharmacologic, pharmacokinetic, and therapeutic differences among ACE inhibitors.
Pharmacotherapy. 1998 May-Jun;18(3):588-99.
6
Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors in veterinary medicine.兽医学中的血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂
Curr Pharm Des. 2007;13(13):1347-61. doi: 10.2174/138161207780618830.
7
Matching the standards of clinical trial evidence with application in practice.
Int J Clin Pract. 2002 Dec;56(10):772-5.
8
Overview of the angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors.血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂概述。
Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2000 Oct 1;57 Suppl 1:S3-7. doi: 10.1093/ajhp/57.suppl_1.S3.
9
Tissue angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors: are they more effective than serum angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors?组织血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂:它们比血清血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂更有效吗?
Clin Cardiol. 2005 Dec;28(12):551-5. doi: 10.1002/clc.4960281203.
10
ACE-inhibitor, AT1-receptor-antagonist, or both? A clinical pharmacologist's perspective after publication of the results of ONTARGET.血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂、血管紧张素Ⅱ1型受体拮抗剂,还是两者联用?基于ONTARGET研究结果发表后一位临床药理学家的观点。
Ther Adv Cardiovasc Dis. 2008 Aug;2(4):233-48. doi: 10.1177/1753944708094309.

引用本文的文献

1
Sodium Glucose Co-Transporter 2 Inhibitors and the Cardiovascular System: Current Knowledge and Future Expectations.钠-葡萄糖协同转运蛋白2抑制剂与心血管系统:当前认识与未来展望
Heart Int. 2023 Dec 1;17(2):12-18. doi: 10.17925/HI.2023.17.2.12. eCollection 2023.
2
Sodium-glucose transporter-2 inhibitors for prevention and treatment of cardiorenal complications of type 2 diabetes.钠-葡萄糖共转运蛋白 2 抑制剂用于预防和治疗 2 型糖尿病的心脏肾脏并发症。
Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2021 Jan 11;20(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s12933-021-01213-w.
3
Class effects of SGLT2 inhibitors on cardiorenal outcomes.SGLT2 抑制剂对心肾结局的类效应。
Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2019 Aug 5;18(1):99. doi: 10.1186/s12933-019-0903-4.
4
Class effect for SGLT-2 inhibitors: a tale of 9 drugs.SGLT-2 抑制剂的类效应:9 种药物的故事。
Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2019 Jul 23;18(1):94. doi: 10.1186/s12933-019-0899-9.
5
Advanced Therapy Medicinal Products and Exemptions to the Regulation 1394/2007: How Confident Can We be? An Exploratory Analysis.高级治疗用医药产品及对(欧盟)第1394/2007号法规的豁免:我们能有多大把握?一项探索性分析。
Front Pharmacol. 2012 Feb 14;3:12. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2012.00012. eCollection 2012.
6
Effectiveness of statins for secondary prevention in elderly patients after acute myocardial infarction: an evaluation of class effect.他汀类药物对老年急性心肌梗死后患者二级预防的有效性:类效应评估
CMAJ. 2005 Apr 26;172(9):1187-94. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.1041403.
7
Cost effectiveness of ramipril in patients at high risk for cardiovascular events : economic evaluation of the HOPE (Heart Outcomes Prevention Evaluation) study for Germany from the Statutory Health Insurance perspective.雷米普利对心血管事件高危患者的成本效益:从法定健康保险角度对德国HOPE(心脏结局预防评估)研究进行的经济学评价
Pharmacoeconomics. 2004;22(15):955-73. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200422150-00001.

本文引用的文献

1
Effects of an angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitor, ramipril, on cardiovascular events in high-risk patients.血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂雷米普利对高危患者心血管事件的影响。
N Engl J Med. 2000 Jan 20;342(3):145-53. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200001203420301.
2
Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition as antiatherosclerotic therapy: no answer yet. QUIET Investigators. QUinapril Ischemic Event Trial.
Am J Cardiol. 1999 Jan 1;83(1):43-7. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(98)00780-2.
3
Effect of angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibition compared with conventional therapy on cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in hypertension: the Captopril Prevention Project (CAPPP) randomised trial.血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂与传统疗法相比对高血压患者心血管发病率和死亡率的影响:卡托普利预防项目(CAPPP)随机试验
Lancet. 1999 Feb 20;353(9153):611-6. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(98)05012-0.
4
Antihypertensive therapy in type 2 diabetes: implications of the appropriate blood pressure control in diabetes (ABCD) trial.2型糖尿病的降压治疗:糖尿病患者血压适度控制的意义(ABCD)试验
Am J Cardiol. 1998 Nov 12;82(9B):9R-14R. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(98)00750-4.
5
The Appropriate Blood Pressure Control in Diabetes (ABCD) Trial.
J Hum Hypertens. 1998 Sep;12(9):653-5. doi: 10.1038/sj.jhh.1000660.
6
Impact of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor underdosing on rehospitalization rates in congestive heart failure.
Am J Cardiol. 1998 Aug 15;82(4):465-9. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(98)00361-0.
7
Pharmacologic, pharmacokinetic, and therapeutic differences among ACE inhibitors.
Pharmacotherapy. 1998 May-Jun;18(3):588-99.
8
Regional differences in the characteristics and treatment of patients participating in an international heart failure trial. The Assessment of Treatment with Lisinopril and Survival (ATLAS) Trial Investigators.参与一项国际心力衰竭试验的患者特征及治疗的地区差异。赖诺普利治疗与生存评估(ATLAS)试验研究者。
J Card Fail. 1998 Mar;4(1):3-8. doi: 10.1016/s1071-9164(98)90502-4.
9
Outcome results of the Fosinopril Versus Amlodipine Cardiovascular Events Randomized Trial (FACET) in patients with hypertension and NIDDM.福辛普利与氨氯地平治疗心血管事件随机试验(FACET)在高血压合并非胰岛素依赖型糖尿病患者中的结果
Diabetes Care. 1998 Apr;21(4):597-603. doi: 10.2337/diacare.21.4.597.
10
The effect of nisoldipine as compared with enalapril on cardiovascular outcomes in patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes and hypertension.与依那普利相比,尼索地平对非胰岛素依赖型糖尿病合并高血压患者心血管结局的影响。
N Engl J Med. 1998 Mar 5;338(10):645-52. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199803053381003.

类效应与循证医学。

Class effects and evidence-based medicine.

作者信息

Furberg C D

机构信息

Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27157-1063, USA.

出版信息

Clin Cardiol. 2000 Jul;23(7 Suppl 4):IV15-9. doi: 10.1002/clc.4960230705.

DOI:10.1002/clc.4960230705
PMID:10894451
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6655019/
Abstract

Drugs grouped into a therapeutic class on the basis of a common mechanism of action often have considerably different pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties. Among angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, differences with potential clinical relevance include potency, whether the drug is an active compound or requires metabolic activation, lipophilicity, route(s) of elimination, and half-life. Large clinical trials have documented the clinical benefits of several ACE inhibitors in various patient populations, and many clinical effects of ACE inhibitors are likely to be the same. However, there are possible quantitative differences among ACE inhibitors that may alter the overall therapeutic benefits for specific patient populations and indications. Equipotency in terms of clinical efficacy is difficult to determine. Since the concept of "class effect" is a term of convenience that has no universally accepted definition and subsequently should not form the basis for the practice of evidence-based medicine, untested drugs of a "class" should be considered to be unproven drugs.

摘要

基于共同作用机制归类于同一治疗类别的药物,其药效学和药代动力学特性往往有很大差异。在血管紧张素转换酶(ACE)抑制剂中,具有潜在临床相关性的差异包括效力、药物是活性化合物还是需要代谢激活、亲脂性、消除途径以及半衰期。大型临床试验已证明几种ACE抑制剂在不同患者群体中的临床益处,并且ACE抑制剂的许多临床效果可能相同。然而,ACE抑制剂之间可能存在定量差异,这可能会改变特定患者群体和适应症的总体治疗益处。临床疗效方面的等效性难以确定。由于“类效应”这一概念是一个方便用语,没有普遍接受的定义,因此不应构成循证医学实践的基础,“类”中的未经测试的药物应被视为未经证实的药物。