Giacomini M K, Cook D J
Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Room 2C12, 1200 Main St W, McMaster University Faculty of Health Sciences, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada L8N 3Z5.
JAMA. 2000 Jul 26;284(4):478-82. doi: 10.1001/jama.284.4.478.
The second part of this 2-part series on how to interpret qualitative research addresses, "what are the results," and, "how do they help me care for my patients?" Qualitative analysis is a process of summarizing and interpreting data to develop theoretical insights that describe and explain social phenomena such as interactions, experiences, roles, perspectives, symbols, and organizations. Key results are often illustrated with excerpts from interview transcripts, field notes, or documents. The results of a qualitative research report are best understood as an empirically based contribution to ongoing dialogue and exploration. Empirically based theory evolves from a process of exploration, discovery, analysis, and synthesis. Each concept should be defined carefully in a way that is meaningful to the reader. Concepts should be adequately developed and illustrated when theoretical conclusions are drawn. Arguments should be explained and justified. The qualitative research report ideally should address how the findings relate to other theories in the field. The qualitative study can provide a useful road map for understanding and navigating similar social settings interactions, or relationships. JAMA. 2000;284:478-482
这个关于如何解读定性研究的系列文章共两部分,第二部分探讨“研究结果是什么”以及“这些结果如何帮助我照顾我的患者”。定性分析是一个总结和解读数据的过程,目的是形成理论见解,以描述和解释诸如互动、经历、角色、观点、符号和组织等社会现象。关键结果通常会用访谈记录、实地笔记或文件中的摘录来说明。定性研究报告的结果最好被理解为对正在进行的对话和探索基于实证的贡献。基于实证的理论源于探索、发现、分析和综合的过程。每个概念都应以对读者有意义的方式仔细定义。在得出理论结论时,概念应得到充分阐述和说明。论点应加以解释和论证。理想情况下,定性研究报告应阐述研究结果与该领域其他理论的关系。定性研究可以为理解和梳理类似的社会环境互动或关系提供有用的路线图。《美国医学会杂志》。2000年;284:478 - 482