Dannaoui E, Persat F, Monier M F, Borel E, Piens M A, Picot S
Laboratoire de Parasitologie, Mycologie Médicale et Pathologie Exotique, Université Claude Bernard Lyon I, France.
Can J Microbiol. 1999 Oct;45(10):871-4.
A comparative study of visual and spectrophotometric MIC endpoint determinations for antifungal susceptibility testing of Aspergillus species was performed. A broth microdilution method adapted from the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (NCCLS) was used for susceptibility testing of 180 clinical isolates of Aspergillus species against amphotericin B and itraconazole. MICs were determined visually and spectrophotometrically at 490 nm after 24, 48, and 72 h of incubation, and MIC pairs were compared. The agreement between the two methods was 99% for amphotericin B and ranged from 95 to 98% for itraconazole. It is concluded that spectrophotometric MIC endpoint determination is a valuable alternative to the visual reference method for susceptibility testing of Aspergillus species.
开展了一项关于曲霉属真菌药敏试验中视觉法和分光光度法测定最低抑菌浓度(MIC)终点的比较研究。采用一种根据美国国家临床实验室标准委员会(NCCLS)改编的肉汤微量稀释法,对180株曲霉属临床分离株针对两性霉素B和伊曲康唑进行药敏试验。在孵育24、48和72小时后,通过视觉法和在490nm波长处的分光光度法测定MIC,并对MIC配对结果进行比较。两性霉素B两种方法之间的一致性为99%,伊曲康唑的一致性在95%至98%之间。结论是,在曲霉属真菌药敏试验中,分光光度法测定MIC终点是视觉参考方法的一种有价值的替代方法。