Alexander J M, McIntire D D, Leveno K J
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas, Dallas, Texas 75235-9032, USA.
Obstet Gynecol. 2000 Aug;96(2):291-4. doi: 10.1016/s0029-7844(00)00862-0.
To assess pregnancy outcomes at 40, 41, and 42 weeks' gestation when labor induction is done routinely at 42 but not 41 weeks.
We reviewed all singleton pregnancies delivered at 40 or more weeks' gestation between 1988 and 1998 at Parkland Memorial Hospital, Dallas, Texas. We excluded women with hypertension, prior cesarean, diabetes, malformations, breech presentation, and placenta previa. Labor characteristics and neonatal outcomes of pregnancies at 41 and 42 weeks' gestation were compared with pregnancies that ended at 40 weeks. Women with certain dating criteria had induction of labor at 42 weeks. Gestational age was calculated from the last menstrual period (LMP), sonography when available, and clinical examination. If the fundal height between 18 and 30 weeks was within 2 cm of gestational age, the reported LMP was accepted as correct. Sonogram was used to calculate gestational age if a discrepancy was identified. Statistical analysis consisted of chi(2) and analysis of variance.
We studied 56,317 pregnancies: 29,136 at 40 weeks, 16,386 at 41 weeks, and 10,795 at 42 weeks. Labor complications increased from 40 to 42 weeks, including oxytocin induction (2% versus 35%, P <.001), length of labor (5.5 +/- 4.9 versus 8.8 +/- 6. 5 hours, P <.001), prolonged second stage of labor (2% versus 4%, P <.001), forceps use (6% versus 9%, P <.001), and cesarean delivery (7% versus 14%, P <.001). Neonatal outcomes were similar in the three groups, including 5-minute Apgar score less than 4, admission to the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU), umbilical artery pH less than 7, seizures, and perinatal mortality. Sepsis was more frequent in the 42-week group than the other groups (0.1 versus 0.3%, P =. 001), as was admission to the NICU (0.4 versus 0.6%, P =.008).
Routine labor induction at 41 weeks likely increases labor complications and operative delivery without significantly improving neonatal outcomes.
评估在妊娠42周而非41周时常规进行引产的情况下,妊娠40周、41周和42周时的妊娠结局。
我们回顾了1988年至1998年间在得克萨斯州达拉斯市帕克兰纪念医院分娩的所有孕周为40周及以上的单胎妊娠。我们排除了患有高血压、既往剖宫产史、糖尿病、畸形、臀位和前置胎盘的女性。将妊娠41周和42周时的分娩特征和新生儿结局与妊娠40周时结束的妊娠进行比较。符合特定预产期标准的女性在42周时进行引产。孕周根据末次月经日期(LMP)计算,如有超声检查结果则结合超声检查结果及临床检查来确定。如果孕18至30周时宫高与孕周相差在2厘米以内,则所报告的LMP被认为是正确的。如果发现有差异,则使用超声检查来计算孕周。统计分析包括卡方检验和方差分析。
我们研究了56317例妊娠:40周时29136例,41周时16386例,42周时10795例。分娩并发症从40周增加到42周,包括催产素引产(2%对35%,P<.001)、产程长度(5.5±4.9小时对8.8±6.5小时,P<.001)、第二产程延长(2%对4%,P<.001)、产钳使用(6%对9%,P<.001)以及剖宫产(7%对14%,P<.001)。三组的新生儿结局相似,包括5分钟阿氏评分低于4分、入住新生儿重症监护病房(NICU)、脐动脉pH值低于7、惊厥和围产儿死亡率。42周组的败血症发生率高于其他组(0.1%对0.3%,P=.001),入住NICU的情况也是如此(0.4%对0.6%,P=.008)。
在41周时常规引产可能会增加分娩并发症和手术分娩率,而不会显著改善新生儿结局。