• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

动物咬伤流行病学及狂犬病暴露后预防监测。

Animal bite epidemiology and surveillance for rabies postexposure prophylaxis.

作者信息

Moore D A, Sischo W M, Hunter A, Miles T

机构信息

Department of Biobehavioral Health, College of Health and Human Development, Pennsylvania State University, University Park 16802, USA.

出版信息

J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2000 Jul 15;217(2):190-4. doi: 10.2460/javma.2000.217.190.

DOI:10.2460/javma.2000.217.190
PMID:10909457
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To understand the epidemiology of animal bites and exposure, evaluate the animal exposure reporting system for surveillance of rabies postexposure prophylaxis (PEP), and identify opportunities to reduce PEP.

DESIGN

Period prevalence survey.

STUDY POPULATION

Pennsylvania residents in 1995.

PROCEDURE

Data from animal bite reports from Pennsylvania county health offices were summarized for 1995. Animal bite incidences for the state, counties, various age groups, and various population densities were calculated. Animal species, treatment, location of wounds, and PEP recommendations were evaluated for exposures.

RESULTS

More than 16,000 animal-related potential rabies exposures were reported from 65 of 67 counties in Pennsylvania. The highest incidence was in children less than 5 years old (324/100,000). Of the 75% of victims requiring wound treatment, 50% received antimicrobials, 29% received a tetanus toxoid, and 19% had wounds sutured, were admitted to hospitals, or were referred for plastic surgery. Although 75% of exposures were to dogs, victims exposed to cats were 6 times as likely to receive PEP (relative risk, 6.1; 95% confidence interval, 5.1 to 7.4). Thirty percent of 556 PEP were given for exposures to dogs, 44% for cats, 7% for raccoons, 4% for bats, 2.5% for squirrels, 2.1% for groundhogs, 2% for foxes, and 8% for exposures to other species. Fifty-nine percent of owned dogs were up-to-date on rabies vaccinations compared with 41% of owned cats.

CONCLUSION

Interventions, such as dog bite prevention education, vaccination of pets against rabies, appropriate use of PEP, and reduction of feral cat populations, should be instituted, enhanced, or better enforced in communities.

摘要

目的

了解动物咬伤和暴露的流行病学情况,评估用于狂犬病暴露后预防(PEP)监测的动物暴露报告系统,并确定减少PEP的机会。

设计

期间患病率调查。

研究人群

1995年的宾夕法尼亚州居民。

程序

汇总了宾夕法尼亚州县卫生办公室1995年动物咬伤报告的数据。计算了该州、各县、不同年龄组和不同人口密度的动物咬伤发生率。对暴露的动物种类、治疗情况、伤口位置和PEP建议进行了评估。

结果

宾夕法尼亚州67个县中的65个县报告了超过16000起与动物相关的潜在狂犬病暴露事件。发病率最高的是5岁以下儿童(324/100,000)。在需要伤口治疗的受害者中,75%接受了抗菌药物治疗,50%接受了破伤风类毒素治疗,19%的伤口进行了缝合、住院或被转诊进行整形手术。虽然75%的暴露是被狗咬伤,但被猫暴露的受害者接受PEP的可能性是前者的6倍(相对风险,6.1;95%置信区间,5.1至7.4)。在556例PEP中,30%是针对被狗暴露,44%是针对被猫暴露,7%是针对被浣熊暴露,4%是针对被蝙蝠暴露,2.5%是针对被松鼠暴露,2.1%是针对被土拨鼠暴露,2%是针对被狐狸暴露,8%是针对被其他物种暴露。59%的家养狗按时接种了狂犬病疫苗,而家养猫的这一比例为41%。

结论

社区应开展、加强或更好地执行一些干预措施,如预防狗咬伤教育、宠物狂犬病疫苗接种、合理使用PEP以及减少野猫数量。

相似文献

1
Animal bite epidemiology and surveillance for rabies postexposure prophylaxis.动物咬伤流行病学及狂犬病暴露后预防监测。
J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2000 Jul 15;217(2):190-4. doi: 10.2460/javma.2000.217.190.
2
Epidemiology and surveillance of human animal-bite injuries and rabies post-exposure prophylaxis, in selected counties in Kenya, 2011-2016.肯尼亚部分县 2011-2016 年人间动物咬伤和狂犬病暴露后预防的流行病学和监测。
BMC Public Health. 2018 Aug 9;18(1):996. doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-5888-5.
3
A multicentric community survey on animal exposures among humans in India.印度人群中动物暴露的多中心社区调查。
Indian J Public Health. 2019 Sep;63(Supplement):S9-S14. doi: 10.4103/ijph.IJPH_374_19.
4
Potential rabies exposures in a Virginia county.弗吉尼亚州一个县潜在的狂犬病暴露情况。
Public Health Rep. 1998 May-Jun;113(3):258-62.
5
Urban epizootic of rabies in Mexico: epidemiology and impact of animal bite injuries.墨西哥狂犬病城市流行:动物咬伤的流行病学及影响
Bull World Health Organ. 1993;71(5):615-24.
6
Rabies postexposure prophylaxis, New York, 1995-2000.纽约1995 - 2000年狂犬病暴露后预防处理
Emerg Infect Dis. 2005 Dec;11(12):1921-7. doi: 10.3201/eid1112.041278.
7
Improper wound treatment and delay of rabies post-exposure prophylaxis of animal bite victims in China: Prevalence and determinants.中国动物咬伤受害者伤口处理不当及狂犬病暴露后预防延迟的情况:患病率及影响因素
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2017 Jul 10;11(7):e0005663. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0005663. eCollection 2017 Jul.
8
Trends and spatial distribution of animal bites and vaccination status among victims and the animal population, Uganda: A veterinary surveillance system analysis, 2013-2017.乌干达受害者及动物群体中动物咬伤情况和疫苗接种状况的趋势与空间分布:一项2013 - 2017年的兽医监测系统分析
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2021 Apr 19;15(4):e0007944. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0007944. eCollection 2021 Apr.
9
Determinants of health seeking behavior of animal bite victims in rabies endemic South Bhutan: a community-based contact-tracing survey.影响动物咬伤患者在南不丹狂犬病流行地区寻求医疗服务行为的因素:基于社区的接触者追踪调查。
BMC Public Health. 2019 Feb 27;19(1):237. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-6559-x.
10
Prevalence of delayed initiation of rabies postexposure prophylaxis and factors influencing it among animal bite victims from Eastern Uttar Pradesh, India.印度北方邦东部动物咬伤受害者中狂犬病暴露后预防起始延迟的流行情况及其影响因素。
Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2024 Jun 4;118(6):399-404. doi: 10.1093/trstmh/trae002.

引用本文的文献

1
Rabies in Cats-An Emerging Public Health Issue.猫狂犬病:一个新出现的公共卫生问题。
Viruses. 2024 Oct 19;16(10):1635. doi: 10.3390/v16101635.
2
Feline and Canine Rabies in New York State, USA.美国纽约州的猫科动物和犬科狂犬病
Viruses. 2021 Mar 10;13(3):450. doi: 10.3390/v13030450.
3
Evaluation of post-exposure prophylaxis practices to improve the cost-effectiveness of rabies control in human cases potentially exposed to rabies in southern Bhutan.评估暴露后预防措施,以提高在不丹南部可能接触狂犬病的人类病例中控制狂犬病的成本效益。
BMC Infect Dis. 2020 Mar 6;20(1):203. doi: 10.1186/s12879-020-4926-y.
4
A Case of Letting the Cat out of The Bag-Why Trap-Neuter-Return Is Not an Ethical Solution for Stray Cat () Management.一个泄密的案例——为何诱捕-绝育-放归并非流浪猫管理的道德解决方案
Animals (Basel). 2019 Apr 16;9(4):171. doi: 10.3390/ani9040171.
5
Caregiver Reports of Interactions between Children up to 6 Years and Their Family Dog-Implications for Dog Bite Prevention.照顾者对6岁及以下儿童与其家庭宠物狗之间互动的报告——对预防狗咬的启示
Front Vet Sci. 2017 Aug 30;4:130. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2017.00130. eCollection 2017.
6
Pathobiological investigation of naturally infected canine rabies cases from Sri Lanka.对来自斯里兰卡的自然感染犬狂犬病病例的病理生物学调查。
BMC Vet Res. 2017 Apr 12;13(1):99. doi: 10.1186/s12917-017-1024-5.
7
Pattern of animal bites and post exposure prophylaxis in rabies: A five year study in a tertiary care unit in Sri Lanka.狂犬病动物咬伤模式及暴露后预防:斯里兰卡一家三级医疗机构的五年研究
BMC Infect Dis. 2016 Feb 4;16:62. doi: 10.1186/s12879-016-1394-5.
8
Rabies prevention and management of cats in the context of trap-neuter-vaccinate-release programmes.狂犬病预防和管理猫在陷阱-绝育-疫苗接种-释放计划的背景下。
Zoonoses Public Health. 2014 Jun;61(4):290-6. doi: 10.1111/zph.12070. Epub 2013 Jul 17.
9
A multi-site study on knowledge, attitudes, beliefs and practice of child-dog interactions in rural China.中国农村儿童与犬互动的知识、态度、信念和实践的多地点研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2013 Mar 7;10(3):950-62. doi: 10.3390/ijerph10030950.
10
A survey of Canadian public health personnel regarding knowledge, practice and education of zoonotic diseases.一项针对加拿大公共卫生人员关于人畜共患病的知识、实践和教育情况的调查。
Zoonoses Public Health. 2013 Nov;60(7):519-25. doi: 10.1111/zph.12029. Epub 2012 Dec 28.