Kwapil T R, Raulin M L, Midthun J C
Department of Psychology, University of North Carolina at Greensboro, 27402-6164, USA.
J Nerv Ment Dis. 2000 Jul;188(7):402-8. doi: 10.1097/00005053-200007000-00002.
The predictive validity of the Intense Ambivalence Scale was examined in a 10-year longitudinal study of 362 psychometrically identified psychosis-prone and control participants. Elevated scores on the Intense Ambivalence Scale predicted psychotic-like and depressive symptoms, and the development of psychotic illnesses at the 10-year follow-up assessment (after the removal of variance for membership in the psychosis-prone and control groups). Elevated scores on the scale were also associated with substance abuse, schizotypal symptoms, and impaired functioning at both the initial and follow-up assessments. The Intense Ambivalence Scale did not differentially enhance the predictive power of the Perceptual Aberration or the Magical Ideation Scales.
在一项对362名经心理测量确定为易患精神病者和对照组参与者的为期10年的纵向研究中，对强烈矛盾情感量表的预测效度进行了检验。在10年随访评估中（去除易患精神病组和对照组成员的方差后），强烈矛盾情感量表得分升高可预测类精神病症状和抑郁症状以及精神病性疾病的发生。在初始评估和随访评估中，该量表得分升高还与药物滥用、分裂型症状及功能受损有关。强烈矛盾情感量表并未显著增强感知异常量表或神奇观念量表的预测能力。
Zotero 插件