• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

澳大利亚医院对剖宫产术后阴道分娩的认知与态度。VBAC研究小组。剖宫产术后阴道分娩

Knowledge and attitudes about vaginal birth after Caesarean section in Australian hospitals. VBAC Study Group. Vaginal Birth After Caesarean.

作者信息

Appleton B, Targett C, Rasmussen M, Readman E, Sale F, Permezel M

机构信息

Mercy Hospital for Women, Melbourne, Victoria.

出版信息

Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2000 May;40(2):195-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1479-828x.2000.tb01146.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1479-828x.2000.tb01146.x
PMID:10925909
Abstract

A survey of staff attitudes and knowledge about vaginal birth after Caesarean section (VBAC) was undertaken in Australian hospitals. There was a high response rate (67%), and over 900 responses were analysed. Generally, there was a high level of awareness about outcomes and the relative importance of many issues in considering VBAC. Registrars, consultants and midwives differed significantly in some aspects of their knowledge and attitudes to VBAC. There was also a wide range of opinion within each group. Approximately half (53%) of respondents believed patients should be actively encouraged to consider VBAC, whereas 47% felt it should be simply presented as an option.

摘要

澳大利亚多家医院对工作人员关于剖宫产术后阴道分娩(VBAC)的态度和知识进行了一项调查。回复率很高(67%),并对900多份回复进行了分析。总体而言,对于考虑VBAC的结果和许多问题的相对重要性有较高的认知度。住院医生、顾问医生和助产士在VBAC的知识和态度的某些方面存在显著差异。每个组内也存在广泛的意见分歧。大约一半(53%)的受访者认为应该积极鼓励患者考虑VBAC,而47%的人认为应将其仅作为一种选择告知患者。

相似文献

1
Knowledge and attitudes about vaginal birth after Caesarean section in Australian hospitals. VBAC Study Group. Vaginal Birth After Caesarean.澳大利亚医院对剖宫产术后阴道分娩的认知与态度。VBAC研究小组。剖宫产术后阴道分娩
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2000 May;40(2):195-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1479-828x.2000.tb01146.x.
2
Vaginal birth after Caesarean section: a survey of practice in Australia and New Zealand.剖宫产术后阴道分娩:澳大利亚和新西兰的实践调查
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2003 Jun;43(3):226-31. doi: 10.1046/j.0004-8666.2003.00073.x.
3
Trends in birth choices after caesarean section in Japan: A national survey examining information and access to vaginal birth after caesarean.日本剖宫产术后分娩选择趋势:一项关于剖宫产术后阴道分娩信息及途径的全国性调查
Midwifery. 2016 Jun;37:49-56. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2016.04.001. Epub 2016 Apr 8.
4
Caring for women wanting a vaginal birth after previous caesarean section: A qualitative study of the experiences of midwives and obstetricians.护理有过剖宫产史且希望经阴道分娩的女性:一项关于助产士和产科医生经历的定性研究。
Women Birth. 2017 Feb;30(1):3-8. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2016.05.011. Epub 2016 Jun 16.
5
Vaginal birth after Caesarean risk decision-making: Australian findings on the mothers' perspective.剖宫产术后经阴道分娩的风险决策:澳大利亚关于母亲观点的研究结果。
Int J Nurs Pract. 2010 Jun;16(3):274-81. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-172X.2010.01841.x.
6
From coercion to respectful care: women's interactions with health care providers when planning a VBAC.从强制到尊重的护理:妇女在计划 VBAC 时与医疗保健提供者的互动。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022 Jan 27;22(1):70. doi: 10.1186/s12884-022-04407-6.
7
Perspectives on the practice of vaginal birth after caesarean section in East Africa.东非剖宫产术后阴道分娩实践的观点
East Afr Med J. 2010 Aug;87(8):335-9.
8
Deciding on the mode of birth after a previous caesarean section - An online survey investigating women's preferences in Western Switzerland.既往剖宫产术后分娩方式的选择——一项调查瑞士西部女性偏好的在线调查
Midwifery. 2017 Jul;50:219-227. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2017.04.005. Epub 2017 Apr 21.
9
A critical review of vaginal birth rates after a primary Caesarean in Queensland hospitals.昆士兰医院首次剖宫产术后阴道分娩率的批判性综述。
Aust Health Rev. 2013 Nov;37(5):642-8. doi: 10.1071/AH13044.
10
Vaginal birth after cesarean birth: a national survey of U.S. midwifery practice.剖宫产术后经阴道分娩:美国助产实践的全国性调查。
J Midwifery Womens Health. 2002 Sep-Oct;47(5):347-52. doi: 10.1016/s1526-9523(02)00286-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Perceptions of Obstetrics/Gynecology Surgeons on Non-medically Indicated Cesarean Sections: A Cross-Sectional Study.妇产科外科医生对非医学指征剖宫产的看法:一项横断面研究。
Cureus. 2023 Sep 1;15(9):e44508. doi: 10.7759/cureus.44508. eCollection 2023 Sep.
2
Acceptance of trial of labor after cesarean (Tolac) among obstetricians in the Western Region of Saudi Arabia: A cross-sectional study.沙特阿拉伯西部地区产科医生对剖宫产术后阴道试产(TOLAC)的接受情况:一项横断面研究。
Saudi J Biol Sci. 2021 May;28(5):2795-2801. doi: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2021.02.010. Epub 2021 Feb 16.
3
Clinicians' views of factors influencing decision-making for caesarean section: A systematic review and metasynthesis of qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods studies.
临床医生对影响剖宫产决策因素的看法:定性、定量和混合方法研究的系统评价和荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2018 Jul 27;13(7):e0200941. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0200941. eCollection 2018.
4
Birth after caesarean study--planned vaginal birth or planned elective repeat caesarean for women at term with a single previous caesarean birth: protocol for a patient preference study and randomised trial.剖宫产术后分娩研究——对于有过一次剖宫产史的足月孕妇,计划阴道分娩还是计划择期再次剖宫产:一项患者偏好研究及随机试验的方案
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2007 Aug 14;7:17. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-7-17.