Cieślak R, Widerszal-Bazyl M, Luszczyñska-Cieślak A
Department of Ergonomics, Central Institute for Labour Protection, Warsaw, Poland.
Int J Occup Saf Ergon. 2000;6(2):257-92. doi: 10.1080/10803548.2000.11076455.
The study concerns the moderating role of two variables--hardiness and social support--in the relation between job stressors and well-being. It was checked if there is a connection between hardiness and social support, and if these variables are directly related to the level of well-being. It was also hypothesized that hardiness and social support buffer the negative influence of stressors on well-being. The fact that social support and well-being are multidimensional variables was taken into account. The cross-sectional study was conducted on a group of 200 women employed as office workers. The results showed that hardiness correlates with the indexes of emotional support as well as practical support coming from supervisors. The connection, however, was not strong. Hardiness and social support were directly connected with the level of well-being. Interaction of these two independent variables played a marginal role. As far as the buffering role of these variables was concerned, the results have shown that hardiness did not play a buffering role and social support did to a limited degree only. The results of the study proved that it is justifiable to treat social support and well-being as multidimensional variables.
该研究关注两个变量——心理韧性和社会支持——在工作压力源与幸福感之间关系中的调节作用。研究检验了心理韧性与社会支持之间是否存在联系,以及这些变量是否与幸福感水平直接相关。研究还假设心理韧性和社会支持会缓冲压力源对幸福感的负面影响。研究考虑了社会支持和幸福感是多维变量这一事实。对一组200名从事办公室工作的女性进行了横断面研究。结果表明,心理韧性与情感支持指数以及来自上级的实际支持相关。然而,这种联系并不强烈。心理韧性和社会支持与幸福感水平直接相关。这两个自变量的交互作用发挥的作用很小。就这些变量的缓冲作用而言,结果表明心理韧性没有起到缓冲作用,而社会支持仅在有限程度上起到了缓冲作用。该研究结果证明,将社会支持和幸福感视为多维变量是合理的。