Kennedy S M, Le Moual N, Choudat D, Kauffmann F
School of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene, University of British Columbia, 2206 East Mall, Vancouver, BC, Canada V6T 1Z3.
Occup Environ Med. 2000 Sep;57(9):635-41. doi: 10.1136/oem.57.9.635.
To develop a method suitable for estimating exposure risks in population studies of asthma from job titles and international codes, by combining a new job exposure matrix (JEM) with the expert judgement approach. The method was applied in the French epidemiological study of the genetics and environment in asthma (EGEA).
The JEM contains 22 exposure groups including 18 high risk groups based on known risk factors for occupational asthma, divided into high molecular weight agents, low molecular weight agents, and mixed environments. After applying the JEM to job codes, exposure estimates for each subject were re-evaluated by examining job title texts. Three high risk exposure estimates for asthma were compared: firstly, applying the JEM to original codes (from different coders in each study centre); secondly, applying the JEM to revised codes (from one experienced coder); and thirdly, after reviewing JEM exposure estimates in the light of job title texts.
The study comprised 173 cases with asthma and 285 controls (age 18-65). Odds ratios (ORs) for asthma for high risk jobs were 1.0 (95% confidence interval (95% CI) 0.6 to 1.7), applying the JEM to original codes; 1.4 (95% CI 0.8 to 2.3), applying the JEM to revised codes; and 1.7 (95% CI 1.1 to 2.7), applying the JEM and subsequently re-evaluating exposure estimates from job title texts. Asthma ORs were 1.4 (95% CI 0.6 to 2.9) for high molecular weight agents, 2.3 (95% CI 1.2 to 4.4) for low molecular weight agents, and 2.1 (95% CI 0.9 to 5.2) for mixed environments.
This asthma JEM, when enhanced by expert re-evaluation of exposure estimates from job title texts, may be a useful tool in general population studies of asthma. In this study, a 1.7-fold increase in prevalence odds of high risk exposures was found among asthmatic workers compared with controls, with risk magnitude varying for different classes of exposure.
通过将新的工作暴露矩阵(JEM)与专家判断方法相结合,开发一种适用于在哮喘人群研究中根据职业头衔和国际编码估算暴露风险的方法。该方法应用于法国哮喘遗传学与环境流行病学研究(EGEA)。
JEM包含22个暴露组,其中包括18个基于职业性哮喘已知危险因素的高风险组,分为高分子量剂、低分子量剂和混合环境。将JEM应用于工作编码后,通过检查职业头衔文本对每个受试者的暴露估计值进行重新评估。比较了三种哮喘高风险暴露估计值:第一,将JEM应用于原始编码(每个研究中心的不同编码员提供);第二,将JEM应用于修订编码(由一名经验丰富的编码员提供);第三,根据职业头衔文本对JEM暴露估计值进行审查之后。
该研究包括173例哮喘病例和285名对照(年龄18 - 65岁)。将JEM应用于原始编码时,高风险工作的哮喘比值比(OR)为1.0(95%置信区间(95%CI)0.6至1.7);将JEM应用于修订编码时,OR为1.4(95%CI 0.8至2.3);将JEM应用并随后根据职业头衔文本重新评估暴露估计值时,OR为1.7(95%CI 1.1至2.7)。高分子量剂的哮喘OR为1.4(给95%CI 0.6至2.9),低分子量剂为2.3(95%CI 1.2至4.4),混合环境为2.1(95%CI 0.9至5.2)。
这种哮喘JEM,在通过专家根据职业头衔文本对暴露估计值进行重新评估而得到增强后,可能是哮喘人群研究中的一种有用工具。在本研究中,与对照组相比,哮喘患者中高风险暴露的患病率比值增加了1.7倍,不同暴露类别的风险程度有所不同。