Marí-Beffa P, Fuentes L J, Catena A, Houghton G
School of Psychology, University of Wales, Bangor.
Mem Cognit. 2000 Jun;28(4):635-47. doi: 10.3758/bf03201253.
The automaticity of the semantic processing of words has been questioned because of the reduction of semantic priming when the prime word is processed nonsemantically--for example, in letter search (the prime task effect). In two experiments, prime distractor words produced semantic priming in a subsequent lexical decision task, but with the direction of priming (positive or negative) depending on the prime task. Lexico-semantic tasks produced negative semantic priming, whereas letter search produced positive semantic priming. These results are discussed in terms of task-based inhibition. We argue that, given the results from the distractors, the absence of semantic priming does not indicate an absence of semantic activation but reflects the action of control processes on prepotent responses when less practiced responses are needed.
由于当启动词进行非语义加工时语义启动效应会减弱(例如在字母搜索任务中,即启动任务效应),词的语义加工自动化受到了质疑。在两项实验中,启动干扰词在随后的词汇判断任务中产生了语义启动效应,但启动效应的方向(正向或负向)取决于启动任务。词汇语义任务产生负向语义启动效应,而字母搜索产生正向语义启动效应。这些结果基于任务抑制进行了讨论。我们认为,鉴于干扰词的实验结果,语义启动效应的缺失并不表明语义激活不存在,而是反映了在需要较少练习的反应时,控制过程对优势反应的作用。