Suppr超能文献

对拥挤的容忍度的跨文化差异:事实还是虚构?

Cross-cultural differences in tolerance for crowding: fact or fiction?

作者信息

Evans G W, Lepore S J, Allen K M

机构信息

Department of Design and Environmental Analysis, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853-4401, USA.

出版信息

J Pers Soc Psychol. 2000 Aug;79(2):204-10. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.79.2.204.

Abstract

It is widely believed that cultures vary in their tolerance for crowding. There is, however, little evidence to substantiate this belief, coupled with serious shortcomings in the extant literature. Tolerance for crowding has been confused with cultural differences in personal space preferences along with perceived crowding. Furthermore, the few studies that have examined cultural variability in reactions to crowding have compared subgroup correlations, which is not equivalent to a statistical interaction. Although the authors found a statistical interaction indicating that Asian Americans and Latin Americans differ in the way they perceive crowding in comparison to their fellow Anglo-American and African American citizens, all four ethnic groups suffer similar, negative psychological distress sequelae of high-density housing. These results hold independently of household income.

摘要

人们普遍认为,不同文化对拥挤的容忍度有所不同。然而,几乎没有证据能证实这一观点,同时现有文献也存在严重缺陷。对拥挤的容忍度与个人空间偏好以及感知到的拥挤程度方面的文化差异相混淆。此外,少数研究拥挤反应文化变异性的研究比较了亚组相关性,这与统计交互作用并不等同。尽管作者发现了一种统计交互作用,表明与英裔美国人和非裔美国公民相比,亚裔美国人和拉丁美洲人在感知拥挤的方式上存在差异,但所有四个种族群体在高密度住房环境下都会遭受类似的负面心理困扰后果。这些结果不受家庭收入的影响。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验