Wong R K, Hanson D G, Waring P J, Shaw G
Gastroenterology Service, Walter Reed Army Medical Center, Washington, DC 20307-5000, USA.
Am J Gastroenterol. 2000 Aug;95(8 Suppl):S15-22. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9270(00)01074-1.
Reflux laryngitis is a common disease and is probably only one of several laryngeal manifestations associated with GERD. The hypothesis that GER causes laryngeal symptoms and conditions remains to be definitively proved. In many patients, the cause of laryngeal symptoms may well be multifactorial, and to identify definitively those patients in which GER may be playing a role remains a challenge. Documentation of GER using 24-h pH monitoring may assist in identifying such patients. Pharyngeal pH probe monitoring, although not without limitations, may be the optimal method to evaluate such patients in terms of documenting the presence of EPR. A suggested algorithm based on the available data in evaluating and treating patients with suspected reflux laryngitis is shown in Figure 5. First, rule out other causes of hoarseness and laryngitis. An ENT consultation is appropriate for hoarseness present >4 wk. Second, empirically treat with PPIs b.i.d. for 2-3 months, as esophageal and pharyngeal pH monitoring is costly, not readily available, time consuming, and not sensitive in making the diagnosis of GERD related laryngitis. If the patient improves after 2-3 months, therapy should be stopped and the patient observed. If symptoms recur, reinstitution of the PPI at the lowest possible dose or with use of an H2RA to maintain remission should be initiated. Third, if no improvement is noted, the patient should undergo 24-h pH monitoring with an esophageal and, if possible, a pharyngeal probe if the diagnoses of GERD and EPR are still in question. In patients in whom there is a high suspicion for GERD, pH monitoring should be performed on PPI therapy to determine whether acid suppression is adequate. A pH probe should be placed in the stomach if the question to be answered is whether 1) the PPI regimen is maintaining a pH of >4, or 2) if the addition of a bedtime H2RA maintains nocturnal intragastric pH of >4 (52-56). Patients with a completely normal pH study who are on no medications should be referred back to the ENT physician for further evaluation, as other risk factors for chronic laryngitis such as voice overuse may benefit from concomitant voice therapy. If upright reflux is the predominant reflux pattern, increasing the b.i.d. PPI dose is reasonable; but if nighttime supine reflux is predominant, recent literature suggests that the addition of a bedtime H2RA will suppress nocturnal acid breakthrough. There are, however, no long-term studies with the PPI plus H2RA regimen that document persistent nocturnal acid suppression and that show clinically significant differences in patients with nocturnal acid breakthrough. Surgery should be cautiously considered for patients who are unresponsive to PPI therapy and who have documented or undocumented evidence of GERD or EPR. The body of experience concerning GERD and the extraesophageal manifestations of GERD suggests that patients who do not respond to adequate PPI acid suppression will do poorly after antireflux surgery.
反流性喉炎是一种常见疾病,可能只是与胃食管反流病(GERD)相关的几种喉部表现之一。GER导致喉部症状和疾病的假说仍有待明确证实。在许多患者中,喉部症状的原因很可能是多因素的,明确确定GER可能起作用的那些患者仍然是一项挑战。使用24小时pH监测记录GER可能有助于识别此类患者。咽部pH探头监测虽然并非没有局限性,但就记录食管上括约肌功能不全(EPR)的存在而言,可能是评估此类患者的最佳方法。图5显示了一种基于现有数据评估和治疗疑似反流性喉炎患者的建议算法。首先,排除声音嘶哑和喉炎的其他原因。对于持续超过4周的声音嘶哑,应进行耳鼻喉科会诊。其次,经验性地使用质子泵抑制剂(PPI)每日两次治疗2至3个月,因为食管和咽部pH监测成本高、不易获得、耗时且对诊断GERD相关喉炎不敏感。如果患者在2至3个月后病情改善,应停止治疗并观察患者。如果症状复发,应开始以尽可能低的剂量重新使用PPI或使用H2受体拮抗剂(H2RA)以维持缓解。第三,如果没有观察到改善,且GERD和EPR的诊断仍有疑问,患者应进行24小时食管pH监测,如果可能的话,使用咽部探头。对于高度怀疑GERD的患者,应在PPI治疗期间进行pH监测,以确定抑酸是否充分。如果要回答的问题是1)PPI方案是否能维持pH值>4,或2)睡前添加H2RA是否能维持夜间胃内pH值>4(52 - 56),则应在胃内放置pH探头。pH研究完全正常且未服用任何药物的患者应转回耳鼻喉科医生处进行进一步评估,因为慢性喉炎的其他危险因素,如过度用嗓,可能受益于同时进行的嗓音治疗。如果直立位反流是主要的反流模式,增加每日两次的PPI剂量是合理的;但如果夜间仰卧位反流是主要的,最近的文献表明,睡前添加H2RA将抑制夜间酸突破。然而,尚无关于PPI加H2RA方案的长期研究记录持续的夜间抑酸情况,也未显示夜间酸突破患者的临床显著差异。对于对PPI治疗无反应且有GERD或EPR的记录或未记录证据的患者,应谨慎考虑手术。关于GERD和GERD食管外表现的经验表明,对充分的PPI抑酸无反应的患者在抗反流手术后效果不佳。