文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

An artificial neural network as a model for prediction of survival in trauma patients: validation for a regional trauma area.

作者信息

DiRusso S M, Sullivan T, Holly C, Cuff S N, Savino J

机构信息

New York Medical College and Westchester Medical Center, Department of Surgery, Valhalla 10595, USA.

出版信息

J Trauma. 2000 Aug;49(2):212-20; discussion 220-3. doi: 10.1097/00005373-200008000-00006.


DOI:10.1097/00005373-200008000-00006
PMID:10963531
Abstract

BACKGROUND: To develop and validate an artificial neural network (ANN) for predicting survival of trauma patients based on standard prehospital variables, emergency room admission variables, and Injury Severity Score (ISS) using data derived from a regional area trauma system, and to compare this model with known trauma scoring systems. PATIENT POPULATION: The study was composed of 10,609 patients admitted to 24 hospitals comprising a seven-county suburban/rural trauma region adjacent to a major metropolitan area. The data was generated as part of the New York State trauma registry. Study period was from January 1993 through December 1996 (1993-1994: 5,168 patients; 1995: 2,768 patients; 1996: 2,673 patients). METHODS: A standard feed-forward back-propagation neural network was developed using Glasgow Coma Scale, systolic blood pressure, heart rate, respiratory rate, temperature, hematocrit, age, sex, intubation status, ICD-9-CM Injury E-code, and ISS as input variables. The network had a single layer of hidden nodes. Initial network development of the model was performed on the 1993-1994 data. Subsequent models were generated using the 1993, 1994, and 1995 data. The model was tested first on the 1995 and then on the 1996 data. The ANN model was tested against Trauma and Injury Severity Score (TRISS) and ISS using the receiver operator characteristic (ROC) area under the curve [ROC-A(z)], Lemeshow-Hosmer C-statistic, and calibration curves. RESULTS: The ANN showed good clustering of the data, with good separation of nonsurvivors and survivors. The ROCA(z) was 0.912 for the ANN, 0.895 for TRISS, and 0.766 for ISS. The ANN exceeded TRISS with respect to calibration (Lemeshow-Hosmer C-statistic: 7.4 for ANN; 17.1 for TRISS). The prediction of survivors was good for both models. The ANN exceeded TRISS in nonsurvivor prediction. CONCLUSION: An ANN developed for trauma patients using prehospital, emergency room admission data, and ISS gave good prediction of survival. It was accurate and had excellent calibration. This study expands our previous results developed at a single Level I trauma center and shows that an ANN model for predicting trauma deaths can be applied across hospitals with good results

摘要

相似文献

[1]
An artificial neural network as a model for prediction of survival in trauma patients: validation for a regional trauma area.

J Trauma. 2000-8

[2]
Injury severity and probability of survival assessment in trauma patients using a predictive hierarchical network model derived from ICD-9 codes.

J Trauma. 1995-4

[3]
Development of a model for prediction of survival in pediatric trauma patients: comparison of artificial neural networks and logistic regression.

J Pediatr Surg. 2002-7

[4]
Comparison of current injury scales for survival chance estimation: an evaluation comparing the predictive performance of the ISS, NISS, and AP scores in a Dutch local trauma registration.

J Trauma. 2005-3

[5]
Comparison of the Injury Severity Score and ICD-9 diagnosis codes as predictors of outcome in injury: analysis of 44,032 patients.

J Trauma. 1997-3

[6]
Harborview assessment for risk of mortality: an improved measure of injury severity on the basis of ICD-9-CM.

J Trauma. 2000-9

[7]
A new approach to outcome prediction in trauma: A comparison with the TRISS model.

J Trauma. 2006-9

[8]
Norwegian survival prediction model in trauma: modelling effects of anatomic injury, acute physiology, age, and co-morbidity.

Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2014-3

[9]
Predictors of mortality in adult trauma patients: the physiologic trauma score is equivalent to the Trauma and Injury Severity Score.

J Am Coll Surg. 2002-6

[10]
Validation of a base deficit-based trauma prediction model and comparison with TRISS and ASCOT.

Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2016-10

引用本文的文献

[1]
Digitalization in orthopaedics: a narrative review.

Front Surg. 2024-1-11

[2]
Advances in neuroproteomics for neurotrauma: unraveling insights for personalized medicine and future prospects.

Front Neurol. 2023-11-22

[3]
Science fiction or clinical reality: a review of the applications of artificial intelligence along the continuum of trauma care.

World J Emerg Surg. 2023-3-6

[4]
Artificial intelligence and machine learning for hemorrhagic trauma care.

Mil Med Res. 2023-2-16

[5]
Prediction of motor function in patients with traumatic brain injury using genetic algorithms modified back propagation neural network: A data-based study.

Front Neurosci. 2023-1-19

[6]
An artificial intelligence system to predict the optimal timing for mechanical ventilation weaning for intensive care unit patients: A two-stage prediction approach.

Front Med (Lausanne). 2022-11-18

[7]
Using the National Trauma Data Bank (NTDB) and machine learning to predict trauma patient mortality at admission.

PLoS One. 2020

[8]
Machine Learning Models of Survival Prediction in Trauma Patients.

J Clin Med. 2019-6-5

[9]
Comparison of machine learning models for the prediction of mortality of patients with unplanned extubation in intensive care units.

Sci Rep. 2018-11-20

[10]
Mortality prediction in patients with isolated moderate and severe traumatic brain injury using machine learning models.

PLoS One. 2018-11-9

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索