• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对施暴者类型进行测试。

Testing a typology of batterers.

作者信息

Waltz J, Babcock J C, Jacobson N S, Gottman J M

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Montana, USA.

出版信息

J Consult Clin Psychol. 2000 Aug;68(4):658-69.

PMID:10965641
Abstract

A. Holtzworth-Munroe and G. L. Stuart (1994) proposed a tripartite typology of men who batter their female partners based on the severity of violence, extent of violence, and personality disorder characteristics. The current study attempts to empirically validate this typology using data from 75 domestically violent (DV) men and their partners, and 32 maritally distressed, nonviolent (DNV) comparison couples. Mixture analysis results generally supported the model, although 2 types were not distinguishable on personality disorder characteristics as predicted. Generally violent batterers were significantly more violent within and outside the relationship. The pathological group was moderately violent within and outside the relationship and endorsed numerous psychological symptoms. Family-only batterers endorsed fewer symptoms and were less violent. Violence in the family of origin, attachment, and communication skills also differentiated the 3 types and DNV men.

摘要

A. 霍尔特兹沃思 - 门罗和G.L. 斯图尔特(1994年)基于暴力的严重程度、暴力范围和人格障碍特征,提出了对殴打女性伴侣男性的三重分类法。本研究试图使用来自75名家庭暴力(DV)男性及其伴侣以及32对婚姻关系困扰但无暴力行为(DNV)的对照夫妻的数据,对这一分类法进行实证验证。混合分析结果总体上支持该模型,尽管有两种类型在人格障碍特征上并未如预期那样区分开来。一般暴力的殴打者在关系内外的暴力行为明显更多。病态组在关系内外有中度暴力行为,并认可众多心理症状。仅在家庭中施暴的人认可的症状较少且暴力程度较低。原生家庭中的暴力经历、依恋关系和沟通技巧也区分了这三种类型以及DNV男性。

相似文献

1
Testing a typology of batterers.对施暴者类型进行测试。
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2000 Aug;68(4):658-69.
2
Typologies of men who are maritally violent: scientific and clinical implications.婚姻暴力男性的类型学:科学与临床意义
J Interpers Violence. 2004 Dec;19(12):1369-89. doi: 10.1177/0886260504269693.
3
A large sample empirical typology of male spouse abusers and its relationship to dimensions of abuse.男性配偶虐待者的大样本实证类型学及其与虐待维度的关系。
Violence Vict. 1996 Winter;11(4):277-92.
4
Typology of men who are maritally violent: a discussion of Holtzworth-Munroe and Meehan.婚姻暴力男性的类型学:对霍茨沃思 - 门罗和米汉的讨论
J Interpers Violence. 2004 Dec;19(12):1396-400. doi: 10.1177/0886260504269695.
5
The place of a typology of men who are "maritally" violent within a nested ecological model: a response to Holtzworth-Munroe and Meehan.“婚姻”暴力男性类型学在嵌套生态模型中的位置:对霍兹沃思 - 门罗和米汉的回应
J Interpers Violence. 2004 Dec;19(12):1390-5. doi: 10.1177/0886260504269694.
6
Family of origin violence and MCMI-II psychopathology among partner assaultive men.伴侣攻击型男性的原生家庭暴力与明尼苏达多项人格调查表第二版(MCMI-II)心理病理学
Violence Vict. 1993 Summer;8(2):165-76.
7
Testing the Holtzworth-Munroe and Stuart (1994) batterer typology.检验霍尔特沃思-门罗和斯图尔特(1994年)的施暴者类型学。
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2000 Dec;68(6):1000-19. doi: 10.1037//0022-006x.68.6.1000.
8
A psychometric typology of U.K. domestic violence offenders.英国家庭暴力罪犯的心理测量类型学。
J Interpers Violence. 2006 Oct;21(10):1270-85. doi: 10.1177/0886260506291655.
9
The competency of responses given by maritally violent versus nonviolent men to problematic marital situations.婚姻暴力男性与非暴力男性对婚姻问题情境所给出反应的能力。
Violence Vict. 1991 Winter;6(4):257-69.
10
Can sex offender classification inform typologies of male batterers?: a response to Holtzworth-Munroe and Meehan.性犯罪者分类能否为男性殴打者的类型学提供依据?:对霍茨沃思-门罗和米汉的回应。
J Interpers Violence. 2004 Dec;19(12):1405-11. doi: 10.1177/0886260504269790.

引用本文的文献

1
The Psychometric Properties of the Persian Version of Emotional Abuse Questionnaire.波斯语版情感虐待问卷的心理测量特性
Iran J Psychiatry. 2024 Oct;19(4):402-411. doi: 10.18502/ijps.v19i4.16553.
2
IPVAW male perpetrators convicted in Spain: a typology and characterization based on latent class analysis.在西班牙被定罪的侵害妇女暴力行为男性犯罪者:基于潜在类别分析的类型学与特征描述
Front Psychol. 2024 Mar 4;15:1353809. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1353809. eCollection 2024.
3
Couple Conflict Behavior: Disentangling Associations With Relationship Dissatisfaction and Intimate Partner Violence.
夫妻冲突行为:理清与关系不满和亲密伴侣暴力的关联
J Fam Issues. 2023 Nov;44(11):2997-3016. doi: 10.1177/0192513x221123787. Epub 2022 Aug 28.
4
The Association Between Affective and Problem-Solving Communication and Intimate Partner Violence among Caucasian and Mexican American Couples: A Dyadic Approach.白种人和墨西哥裔美国夫妇中情感与解决问题沟通方式与亲密伴侣暴力之间的关联:一种二元研究方法
J Fam Violence. 2016 Feb;31(2):167-178. doi: 10.1007/s10896-015-9762-2. Epub 2015 Jul 11.
5
Women and Violence: Alexithymia, Relational Competence and Styles, and Satisfaction with Life: A Comparative Profile Analysis.女性与暴力:述情障碍、关系能力与风格以及生活满意度:一项比较概况分析
Behav Sci (Basel). 2021 Oct 26;11(11):147. doi: 10.3390/bs11110147.
6
When Does Verbal Aggression in Relationships Covary With Physical Violence?恋爱关系中的言语攻击何时会与身体暴力同时出现?
Psychol Violence. 2021 Jan;11(1):50-60. doi: 10.1037/vio0000311. Epub 2020 Jun 1.
7
Exploring Relationships: A Systematic Review on Intimate Partner Violence and Attachment.探索关系:关于亲密伴侣暴力与依恋的系统综述
Front Psychol. 2018 Jul 5;9:1166. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01166. eCollection 2018.
8
The Price of Distrust: Trust, Anxious Attachment, Jealousy, and Partner Abuse.不信任的代价:信任、焦虑依恋、嫉妒与伴侣虐待。
Partner Abuse. 2015 Jul;6(3):298-319. doi: 10.1891/1946-6560.6.3.298.
9
Patterns of Dating Violence Victimization and Perpetration among Latino Youth.拉丁裔青少年中约会暴力受害与施暴模式
J Youth Adolesc. 2017 Aug;46(8):1727-1742. doi: 10.1007/s10964-016-0621-0. Epub 2016 Dec 22.
10
Negative Affect, Alcohol Consumption, and Female-to-Male Intimate Partner Violence: A Daily Diary Investigation.消极情绪、酒精消费与女性对男性亲密伴侣暴力行为:一项日常日记调查
Partner Abuse. 2013 Jul 1;4(3):332-355. doi: 10.1891/1946-6560.4.3.332.