Yasar S, Forbes J M
Centre for Animal Sciences, Leeds Institute of Biotechnology and Agriculture, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK.
Br J Nutr. 2000 Sep;84(3):297-307. doi: 10.1017/s0007114500001574.
To test whether the improvements in digestive efficiency due to either wetting of the food or inclusion of enzymes are accompanied by the same changes in gut function, foods with a high content of wheat were fed to broiler chicks from 1-42 d old. Twenty-four birds were caged individually while a further sixty-four were in group pens in experiments of 2 x 2 factorial design with two levels of enzyme (0 or 1 g/kg, designed for wheat) and two levels of water addition (0 and 1300 g/kg). Food intake and live-weight gain were significantly increased by wet feeding (from 89.3 to 153.4 g/d and from 39.7 to 65.4 g/d respectively), the differences increasing with age, while the enzyme had no significant effect (120.5 and 122.2 g/d and 51.9 and 53.1g/week respectively). The viscosity of digesta was greatly reduced both by wetting (from 4.40 to 2.64 kPa. s) and enzyme (from 4.47 to 2.57 kPa. s) but there was a significant interaction with age in which the viscosity was low throughout in the wet only, enzyme only and wet + enzyme treatments but declined with age from a very high level in the dry, no enzyme treatment (11.5 kPa. s at 14 d). While wetting increased weight and length of digestive tract and thickness of some parts of the gut, enzyme had no significant effect, tending to reduce gut wall thickness. Crypt cell proliferation rate (CCPR) was significantly reduced by wet feeding (from 39.4 to 28.7 cells/crypt per 2 h) and by enzyme supplementation (from 38.9 to 29.2 cells/crypt per 2 h). Therefore, while both wetting and enzyme addition to the food reduced digesta viscosity and CCPR to a similar extent, the former had marked stimulatory effects on food intake and weight gain while the latter had little effect. The mode of action of wet feeding is therefore deduced to be not primarily through its effects on viscosity and CCPR.
为了测试因食物湿润或添加酶而导致的消化效率提高是否伴随着肠道功能的相同变化,将高含量小麦的食物喂给1至42日龄的肉鸡。在2×2析因设计实验中,24只鸡单独关在笼子里,另外64只鸡养在群养栏中,该实验有两个酶水平(0或1 g/kg,针对小麦设计)和两个加水水平(0和1300 g/kg)。湿喂显著增加了采食量和体重增加(分别从89.3克/天增加到153.4克/天和从39.7克/天增加到65.4克/天),差异随年龄增加,而酶没有显著影响(分别为120.5和122.2克/天以及51.9和53.1克/周)。消化物的粘度通过湿润(从4.40千帕·秒降至2.64千帕·秒)和酶(从4.47千帕·秒降至2.57千帕·秒)都大大降低,但与年龄存在显著交互作用,其中仅湿润、仅酶以及湿润+酶处理组的粘度在整个过程中都较低,而在干燥、无酶处理组中粘度从非常高的水平(14日龄时为11.5千帕·秒)随年龄下降。虽然湿润增加了消化道的重量和长度以及肠道某些部位的厚度,但酶没有显著影响,反而有降低肠壁厚度的趋势。湿喂显著降低了隐窝细胞增殖率(CCPR)(从每2小时每隐窝39.4个细胞降至28.7个细胞),添加酶也降低了CCPR(从每隐窝38.9个细胞降至29.2个细胞)。因此,虽然食物湿润和添加酶都在相似程度上降低了消化物粘度和CCPR,但前者对采食量和体重增加有显著刺激作用,而后者影响很小。因此推断湿喂的作用方式主要不是通过其对粘度和CCPR的影响。