Aeidler H
Arzneimittelforschung. 1975 Feb;25(2A):315-8.
In a multicenter double-blind cross-over trial the therapeutic effect and the tolerance of d-2-(6'-methoxy-2'-naphthyl)-propionic acid (naproxen) and indometacin were compared including 46 patients with rheumatoid arthritis, 35 patients with ankylosing spondylitis and 19 patients with osteoarthrosis. Duration of treatment with both drugs was two to four weeks each. The daily dose of naproxen was 750 mg, that of indometacin l50 mg. In rheumatoid arthritis the combined clinical effect of indometacin was stronger than that of naproxen while both drugs had the same clinical effectiveness in ankylosing spondylitis and osteoarthrosis. When differentiating the total clinical effect as to indices of pain, inflammation and function, indometacin was shown to be superior in all three diseases with regard to pain index. On the other hand, naproxen showed a better effect in ankylosing spondylitis and osteoarthrosis than indometacin as to inflammation, and as to function in osteoarthrosis.
在一项多中心双盲交叉试验中,对d-2-(6'-甲氧基-2'-萘基)-丙酸(萘普生)和吲哚美辛的治疗效果及耐受性进行了比较,该试验纳入了46例类风湿性关节炎患者、35例强直性脊柱炎患者和19例骨关节炎患者。两种药物的治疗期均为每周两到四周。萘普生的日剂量为750毫克,吲哚美辛为150毫克。在类风湿性关节炎中,吲哚美辛的综合临床效果强于萘普生,而在强直性脊柱炎和骨关节炎中,两种药物具有相同的临床疗效。当根据疼痛、炎症和功能指标区分总体临床效果时,吲哚美辛在所有三种疾病的疼痛指标方面均显示出优势。另一方面,在强直性脊柱炎和骨关节炎中,就炎症而言,萘普生比吲哚美辛效果更好,而在骨关节炎中,就功能而言,萘普生效果更好。