Drewe J, Ball H A, Beglinger C, Peng B, Kemmler A, Schächinger H, Haefeli W E
Divisions of Gastroenterology and Clinical Pharmacology, University Hospital of Basel/Kantonsspital, Switzerland.
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2000 Sep;50(3):237-46. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2125.2000.00226.x.
To investigate the effect of acute P-glycoprotein inhibition by the multidrug-resistance (MDR) modulator valspodar (SDZ PSC 833; PSC) on the pharmacokinetics, and potentially adverse pharmacodynamic effects of morphine, and its principal pharmacologically active metabolites, morphine-3-glucuronide (M3G) and morphine-6-glucuronide (M6G).
In a double-blind, three-way crossover study, the pharmacokinetic and potentially adverse pharmacodynamic effects (reaction time, transcutaneous PCO2, blood pressure) of morphine were compared with and without acute inhibition of P-glycoprotein by PSC. The effects of PSC alone were also evaluated. The study was performed in 18 healthy male volunteers and pharmacodynamic effects analysed by measuring the area under the effect (AUE) curve. 150 mg PSC (or its placebo) was given as an i.v. infusion over 2 h. With the expected inhibition of Pgp 1 h after starting PSC infusion, 7.5 morphine HCl (or its placebo) was infused over 2 h.
The infusion of PSC resulted in blood concentrations expected to inhibit Pgp mediated transport. While the pharmacokinetics of plasma morphine and M6G. were unaffected there was a small but statistically significant increase in the AUC and Cmax of M3G (11.8 and 8.3%, respectively). The t(1/2) and tmax were unaffected. The pharmacokinetic parameters of PSC were not affected by coadministration with morphine. PSC did not significantly affect the adverse events of morphine, as assessed by spontaneous reporting. Compared with PSC alone, morphine elicited an increase in reaction time (Emax 48 ms, compared with the predose absolute reaction time of 644 ms), which was not detected by the alertness-drowsiness score, indicating only slight sedation. There was a significant decrease in systolic blood pressure (Emin -9 mm Hg), and a trend for a fall in diastolic blood pressure (Emin -14.5 mm Hg) and respiratory rate (Emin -1.8 breath x min(-1)). For all these parameters, the effects of PSC/morphine were similar to that of PSC alone, suggesting some attenuation of morphine's effect. In contrast, morphine caused a significant increase in PCO2 (Emax 0.69 kPa) compared to PSC alone, indicating slight respiratory depression. This increase was similar to that of the PSC/morphine combination.
Acute inhibition of P-glycoprotein by PSC in this setting does not affect the pharmacokinetic or safety-related pharmacodynamic profile of morphine in a clinically significant manner.
研究多药耐药(MDR)调节剂伐司朴达(SDZ PSC 833;PSC)急性抑制P-糖蛋白对吗啡及其主要药理活性代谢产物吗啡-3-葡萄糖醛酸苷(M3G)和吗啡-6-葡萄糖醛酸苷(M6G)药代动力学以及潜在不良药效学效应的影响。
在一项双盲、三交叉研究中,比较了有无PSC急性抑制P-糖蛋白情况下吗啡的药代动力学及潜在不良药效学效应(反应时间、经皮二氧化碳分压、血压)。还评估了单独使用PSC的效果。该研究在18名健康男性志愿者中进行,通过测量效应曲线下面积(AUE)分析药效学效应。静脉输注150 mg PSC(或其安慰剂),持续2小时。在开始输注PSC 1小时后预期Pgp受到抑制时,静脉输注7.5 mg盐酸吗啡(或其安慰剂),持续2小时。
输注PSC导致血药浓度达到预期抑制Pgp介导转运的水平。虽然血浆吗啡和M6G的药代动力学未受影响,但M3G的AUC和Cmax有小幅但具有统计学意义的增加(分别为11.8%和8.3%)。t(1/2)和tmax未受影响。PSC的药代动力学参数不受与吗啡合用的影响。通过自发报告评估,PSC未显著影响吗啡的不良事件。与单独使用PSC相比,吗啡使反应时间增加(Emax为48 ms,而给药前绝对反应时间为644 ms),警觉-嗜睡评分未检测到这一变化,表明仅有轻微镇静作用。收缩压显著降低(Emin为-9 mmHg),舒张压有下降趋势(Emin为-14.5 mmHg),呼吸频率也有下降趋势(Emin为-1.8次/分钟)。对于所有这些参数,PSC/吗啡的效应与单独使用PSC相似,提示吗啡效应有所减弱。相比之下,与单独使用PSC相比,吗啡使PCO2显著增加(Emax为0.69 kPa),表明有轻微呼吸抑制。这一增加与PSC/吗啡联合用药时相似。
在此情况下,PSC急性抑制P-糖蛋白对吗啡的药代动力学或与安全性相关的药效学特征无临床显著影响。