Suppr超能文献

氯霉素和甲砜霉素对常见需氧及厌氧革兰氏阴性杆菌(不包括沙门氏菌和志贺氏菌)的体外活性比较

Comparative in vitro acitvity of chloramphenicol and thiamphenicol on common aerobic and anaerobic gram-negative bacilli(Salmonella and Shigella excluded).

作者信息

Beers D V, Schoutens E, Vanderlinden M P, Yourassowsky E

出版信息

Chemotherapy. 1975;21(2):73-81. doi: 10.1159/000221849.

Abstract

The antibacterial activity of thiamphenicol was compared to that of chloramphenicol against 313 strains of gram-negative bacilli isolated from various clinical specimens. These two antiboitics were equally active against the 106 isolates of Haemophilus MIC equals 0.1 minus 1.56 mu g/ml) and against 40 strains of Bacteroides fragilis (almost all strains being inhibited by 12.5 mug/ml of the two drugs). In contrast, when compared with chloramphenicol, 2-16 times as much of thiamphenicol was required to inhibit Enterobacteriacae, making prediction of the susceptibility of these strains to thiamphenicol on the basis of chloramphenicol testing alone likely to be hazardous. Disc diffusion test using 30-mug discs and 12 mm as cut-off point was a reliable technique to determine susceptibility of bacteria either to chloramphenicol or thiamphenicol. When thiamphenicol discs of greater potency (50 mug) were employed, many strains exhibited wide zones of inhibition although most of them were resistant by the agar dilution method (MIC is greater than 12.5 mug/ml). This practice is not advisable for testing organisms isolated outside of the urinary tract.

摘要

将甲砜霉素与氯霉素对从各种临床标本中分离出的313株革兰氏阴性杆菌的抗菌活性进行了比较。这两种抗生素对106株流感嗜血杆菌(最低抑菌浓度为0.1至1.56μg/ml)和40株脆弱拟杆菌(几乎所有菌株均被两种药物的12.5μg/ml抑制)的活性相当。相比之下,与氯霉素相比,抑制肠杆菌科细菌需要2至16倍剂量的甲砜霉素,因此仅根据氯霉素测试来预测这些菌株对甲砜霉素的敏感性可能存在风险。使用30μg纸片、以12mm为截断点的纸片扩散试验是确定细菌对氯霉素或甲砜霉素敏感性的可靠技术。当使用效力更高的甲砜霉素纸片(50μg)时,许多菌株表现出较宽的抑菌圈,尽管其中大多数通过琼脂稀释法耐药(最低抑菌浓度大于12.5μg/ml)。对于检测从尿路以外分离出的微生物,这种做法不可取。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验