Chandler L J, Reisner B S, Woods G L, Jafri A K
Department of Pathology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas 77555-0740, USA.
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2000 Aug;37(4):285-7. doi: 10.1016/s0732-8893(00)00149-8.
Four methods (bile solubility, optochin, latex agglutination, and DNA probe) were compared for identification of clinical isolates of Streptococcus pneumoniae. Of 209 isolates tested, 151 (Group I) were selected based on typical colony morphology of S. pneumoniae, while 58 (Group II) were selected on the basis of alpha-hemolysis alone. Using the DNA probe as a reference method, 141 isolates from Group I and 10 from Group II were identified as S. pneumoniae. The optochin disk test and the latex agglutination test both exhibited a 100% sensitivity and specificity for Group I isolates; bile solubility identified all but 1 isolate in this group. For Group II isolates, the sensitivity and specificity of optochin testing was 100%, 80 and 94% for latex and 80 and 100% for bile. The results of this study indicate that all methods tested give reliable results for isolates with typical colony morphology of S. pneumoniae. Bile solubility and latex may not be as reliable when testing alpha-hemolytic colonies without colony morphology typical S. pneumoniae.
比较了四种方法(胆汁溶解试验、奥普托欣试验、乳胶凝集试验和DNA探针法)用于鉴定肺炎链球菌临床分离株。在检测的209株分离株中,151株(第一组)根据肺炎链球菌典型菌落形态选择,而58株(第二组)仅根据α溶血选择。以DNA探针法作为参考方法,第一组中有141株、第二组中有10株被鉴定为肺炎链球菌。奥普托欣纸片试验和乳胶凝集试验对第一组分离株的敏感性和特异性均为100%;胆汁溶解试验除该组1株分离株外鉴定出了所有菌株。对于第二组分离株,奥普托欣试验的敏感性和特异性为100%,乳胶凝集试验的敏感性和特异性分别为80%和94%,胆汁溶解试验的敏感性和特异性分别为80%和100%。本研究结果表明,对于具有肺炎链球菌典型菌落形态的分离株,所有检测方法均能给出可靠结果。在检测无肺炎链球菌典型菌落形态的α溶血菌落时,胆汁溶解试验和乳胶凝集试验可能不太可靠。