Higginson I J, Hearn J, Myers K, Naysmith A
Department of Palliative Care and Policy, King's College London.
Palliat Med. 2000 Jul;14(4):277-86. doi: 10.1191/026921600667691270.
Palliative day care has expanded rapidly in the recent years, but the types of care available vary. To understand more about the different models of day care we conducted a questionnaire survey of the 43-day care centres in North and South Thames Regions in England (total population 13.75 million). The questionnaire covered: management, staffing and organizational policies; the numbers, types and reasons for referral; and the services and care provided. Forty (93%) centres responded. Centres had operated for between 1 and 16 years, mean 8 years. A total of 2268 day care places (mean per centre, 57) were available per week--with an estimated 1.77 places per 10,000 population. Twenty centres had never had a waiting list or had to prioritize patients; 30 had a discharge policy. The mean time the longest patient had been attending was 4.5 years, range 1-12 years. There were a total of 3627 new referrals per year or 3.06 per 10,000 population. Of the 2054 patients recorded by day care centres during a week of detailed monitoring, 1850 (90%) had cancer and 204 had other diseases--most commonly HIV or AIDS, motor neurone disease or stroke. Thirty-four centres were managed by nurses, two by social work or social service professionals, and the remainder by people with other backgrounds. Most units had doctors, nurses, chaplains, managers, aromatherapists and hairdressers, but occupational therapists, social workers, chiropodists, dietitians and music and art therapists were much more varied, as was whether these posts were paid. The most common activities were: review of patients' symptoms or needs, monitoring symptoms, bathing, wound care, physiotherapy, hairdressing and aromatherapy. Centres describing themselves as more or mostly social were less likely to undertake daily assessment of new symptoms and wound care (chi-squared 13.0, 10.1, respectively, df 4, P < 0.05). However, we found no significant differences between centres describing themselves as more medical or more social in reported levels of staffing, who was in charge, funding or most activities. The findings suggest that there are core activities offered in palliative day care, but also variations in medical assessments, nurse-led clinics, trips, art and music therapy, and artistic activities.
近年来,姑息日间护理发展迅速,但提供的护理类型各不相同。为了更深入了解不同的日间护理模式,我们对英格兰泰晤士河以北和以南地区的43家日间护理中心(总人口1375万)进行了问卷调查。问卷涵盖:管理、人员配备和组织政策;转诊的数量、类型和原因;以及提供的服务和护理。40家(93%)中心做出了回应。各中心运营时间在1至16年之间,平均8年。每周共有2268个日间护理床位(平均每个中心57个)——估计每10000人口有1.77个床位。20家中心从未有过等候名单或必须对患者进行优先排序;30家有出院政策。最长住院患者的平均住院时间为4.5年,范围为1至12年。每年共有3627例新转诊患者,即每10000人口中有3.06例。在一周的详细监测中,日间护理中心记录的2054名患者中,1850名(90%)患有癌症,204名患有其他疾病——最常见的是艾滋病毒或艾滋病、运动神经元病或中风。34家中心由护士管理,2家由社会工作或社会服务专业人员管理,其余由其他背景的人员管理。大多数单位有医生、护士、牧师、管理人员、芳香疗法师和美发师,但职业治疗师、社会工作者、足病医生、营养师以及音乐和艺术治疗师的配备差异较大,这些职位是否有薪酬也是如此。最常见的活动包括:复查患者症状或需求、监测症状、洗澡、伤口护理、物理治疗、美发和芳香疗法。自称更具社会性或主要是社会性的中心进行新症状每日评估和伤口护理的可能性较小(卡方值分别为13.0和10.1,自由度为4,P<0.05)。然而,我们发现,在人员配备水平、负责人、资金或大多数活动方面,自称更具医疗性或更具社会性的中心之间没有显著差异。研究结果表明,姑息日间护理提供了一些核心活动,但在医疗评估、护士主导的诊所、出行、艺术和音乐治疗以及艺术活动方面也存在差异。