Suppr超能文献

缓和医疗日间服务面临的挑战:一项焦点小组研究。

Challenges for palliative care day services: a focus group study.

机构信息

Ulster University, Institute of Nursing and Health Research, Shore Road, Newtownabbey, BT37 0QB, Northern Ireland.

School of Psychology, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, BT7 1NN, Northern Ireland.

出版信息

BMC Palliat Care. 2021 Jan 12;20(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s12904-020-00699-7.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Palliative care day services provide a safe environment for people with palliative care needs, enabling them to access a range of services while acting as a respite services for family caregivers. Viewed as marginal services, they are often under resourced and under researched. The aim of this study was to understand how palliative day care services contribute to client care from the perspective of management and hospice multidisciplinary teams.

METHODS

A descriptive qualitative study, using six focus groups conducted with staff at three United Kingdom hospices in England, Scotland and Northern Ireland. Thirty-five participants were recruited, including management and staff. Discussions were transcribed and analysed thematically.

RESULTS

Four key themes emerged: (1) variations of care, beyond heterogeneity of patients; (2) unclear referrals and inconsistent patient population; (3) recognising strengths and challenges and (4) an uncertain future. A major focus of group discussions was the model of care and the benefits of the service, however the importance of demonstrating services' effectiveness and value for money was highlighted.

CONCLUSIONS

Management and hospice staff believed day-services to be a helpful introduction to palliative care, providing both social and medical support. Economic pressures and patient demand were influencing them to move from a social model to a hybrid model. Further research is needed to understand the effectiveness of the service.

摘要

背景

姑息治疗日间服务为有姑息治疗需求的人提供了一个安全的环境,使他们能够在为家庭照顾者提供喘息服务的同时,获得一系列服务。这些服务被视为边缘服务,往往资源不足且研究不足。本研究旨在从管理和姑息治疗多学科团队的角度了解姑息治疗日间服务如何为客户护理做出贡献。

方法

这是一项描述性的定性研究,使用在英格兰、苏格兰和北爱尔兰的三个英国临终关怀中心进行的六次焦点小组。招募了 35 名参与者,包括管理人员和工作人员。对讨论进行了转录和主题分析。

结果

出现了四个关键主题:(1)超越患者异质性的护理差异;(2)转诊和患者群体不明确;(3)认识到优势和挑战;(4)不确定的未来。小组讨论的一个主要焦点是护理模式和服务的好处,但强调了展示服务的有效性和物有所值的重要性。

结论

管理人员和临终关怀工作人员认为日间服务是姑息治疗的有益介绍,提供社会和医疗支持。经济压力和患者需求促使他们从社会模式向混合模式转变。需要进一步研究来了解该服务的效果。

相似文献

1
Challenges for palliative care day services: a focus group study.
BMC Palliat Care. 2021 Jan 12;20(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s12904-020-00699-7.
3
The difficulties of discharging hospice patients to care homes at the end of life: A focus group study.
Palliat Med. 2018 Jul;32(7):1267-1274. doi: 10.1177/0269216318772735. Epub 2018 Apr 30.
4
Expert Perspectives on the Additional Benefit of Day Hospices and Palliative Day Care Clinics in Germany: A Qualitative Approach.
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2024 Feb;41(2):167-172. doi: 10.1177/10499091231168574. Epub 2023 Apr 5.
8
Palliative care experiences of adult cancer patients from ethnocultural groups: a qualitative systematic review protocol.
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):99-111. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1809.
9
Enhancing integrated palliative care: what models are appropriate? A cross-case analysis.
BMC Palliat Care. 2017 Nov 28;16(1):64. doi: 10.1186/s12904-017-0250-8.
10
Benefits of Early Palliative Care Integration in a Day Care Program: The Patients' Perspective.
J Palliat Med. 2023 Nov;26(11):1535-1541. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2023.0279. Epub 2023 Sep 6.

引用本文的文献

2
Bridging the digital readiness gap in palliative home care: A process to data approach.
Digit Health. 2025 May 29;11:20552076251346380. doi: 10.1177/20552076251346380. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
3
Age- and gender-based social inequalities in palliative care for cancer patients: a systematic literature review.
Front Public Health. 2024 Sep 4;12:1421940. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1421940. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
What do patients and family-caregivers value from hospice care? A systematic mixed studies review.
BMC Palliat Care. 2019 Feb 8;18(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s12904-019-0401-1.
2
Quality indicators for Palliative Day Services: A modified Delphi study.
Palliat Med. 2019 Feb;33(2):197-205. doi: 10.1177/0269216318810601. Epub 2018 Nov 19.
3
Saturation in qualitative research: exploring its conceptualization and operationalization.
Qual Quant. 2018;52(4):1893-1907. doi: 10.1007/s11135-017-0574-8. Epub 2017 Sep 14.
4
The Strengths and Challenges of Palliative Day-Care Centers: Qualitative Study With the Professionals Involved.
J Palliat Care. 2017 Apr;32(2):55-60. doi: 10.1177/0825859717733833. Epub 2017 Oct 3.
6
What do we know about different models of providing palliative care? Findings from a systematic review of reviews.
Palliat Med. 2017 Oct;31(9):781-797. doi: 10.1177/0269216317701890. Epub 2017 Apr 5.
9
Evaluation of an admission and discharge programme at a UK specialist palliative day hospice.
Int J Palliat Nurs. 2012 Jun;18(6):275-81. doi: 10.12968/ijpn.2012.18.6.275.
10
Why do health professionals refer individual patients to specialist day hospice care?
J Palliat Med. 2011 Feb;14(2):133-8. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2010.0372. Epub 2011 Jan 16.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验