Menashe C L, Siegel M
Matthews Media Group, Rockville, Maryland, USA.
J Health Commun. 1998 Oct-Dec;3(4):307-25. doi: 10.1080/108107398127139.
For more than three decades, public policy makers and public health officials have had conclusive evidence of the hazards of tobacco use, yet tobacco products remain legal, accessible, and acceptable in our society. Public health advocates have been unable to develop a consistent, coordinated message powerful enough to combat the influence of the tobacco industry. Studying the way in which the tobacco issue has been framed in the mass media over the past decade may provide important clues as to why public health efforts to overcome the tobacco industry's influence on public policy and on tobacco use have not been entirely successful. This paper describes and analyzes the predominant framing tactics used by the tobacco industry and by tobacco control advocates for the last 11 years by reviewing 179 front-page articles from the New York Times and the Washington Post during this period. We conclude that while the tobacco industry has created a central message and theme which has been used constructively and consistently over time, the tobacco control movement has not developed a consistent, powerful, and compelling message. Developing such a message may be important if the nation is to restore progress in reducing tobacco use.
三十多年来,公共政策制定者和公共卫生官员已有确凿证据证明烟草使用的危害,但烟草制品在我们的社会中仍然合法、可得且被接受。公共卫生倡导者未能形成一个一致、协调且有力的信息来对抗烟草行业的影响。研究过去十年大众媒体对烟草问题的呈现方式,可能会为为何公共卫生领域克服烟草行业对公共政策和烟草使用影响的努力未完全成功提供重要线索。本文通过回顾《纽约时报》和《华盛顿邮报》在此期间的179篇头版文章,描述并分析了过去11年中烟草行业和烟草控制倡导者所采用的主要呈现策略。我们得出的结论是,虽然烟草行业创造了一个核心信息和主题,并随着时间的推移持续有效地加以运用,但烟草控制运动尚未形成一个一致、有力且有说服力的信息。如果国家要在减少烟草使用方面恢复进展,形成这样一个信息可能很重要。