Suppr超能文献

中耳病理状况会影响听力耳机产生的耳道声压。

Middle ear pathology can affect the ear-canal sound pressure generated by audiologic earphones.

作者信息

Voss S E, Rosowski J J, Merchant S N, Thornton A R, Shera C A, Peake W T

机构信息

Eaton-Peabody Laboratory, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Boston, USA.

出版信息

Ear Hear. 2000 Aug;21(4):265-74. doi: 10.1097/00003446-200008000-00001.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine how the ear-canal sound pressures generated by earphones differ between normal and pathologic middle ears.

DESIGN

Measurements of ear-canal sound pressures generated by the Etymtic Research ER-3A insert earphone in normal ears (N = 12) were compared with the pressures generated in abnormal ears with mastoidectomy bowls (N = 15), tympanostomy tubes (N = 5), and tympanic-membrane perforations (N = 5). Similar measurements were made with the Telephonics TDH-49 supra-aural earphone in normal ears (N = 10) and abnormal ears with mastoidectomy bowls (N = 10), tympanostomy tubes (N = 4), and tympanic-membrane perforations (N = 5).

RESULTS

With the insert earphone, the sound pressures generated in the mastoid-bowl ears were all smaller than the pressures generated in normal ears; from 250 to 1000 Hz the difference in pressure level was nearly frequency independent and ranged from -3 to -15 dB; from 1000 to 4000 Hz the reduction in level increased with frequency and ranged from -5 dB to -35 dB. In the ears with tympanostomy tubes and perforations the sound pressures were always smaller than in normal ears at frequencies below 1000 Hz; the largest differences occurred below 500 Hz and ranged from -5 to -25 dB. With the supra-aural earphone, the sound pressures in ears with the three pathologic conditions were more variable than those with the insert earphone. Generally, sound pressures in the ears with mastoid bowls were lower than those in normal ears for frequencies below about 500 Hz; above about 500 Hz the pressures showed sharp minima and maxima that were not seen in the normal ears. The ears with tympanostomy tubes and tympanic-membrane perforations also showed reduced ear-canal pressures at the lower frequencies, but at higher frequencies these ear-canal pressures were generally similar to the pressures measured in the normal ears.

CONCLUSIONS

When the middle ear is not normal, ear-canal sound pressures can differ by up to 35 dB from the normal-ear value. Because the pressure level generally is decreased in the pathologic conditions that were studied, the measured hearing loss would exaggerate substantially the actual loss in ear sensitivity. The variations depend on the earphone, the middle ear pathology, and frequency. Uncontrolled variations in ear-canal pressure, whether caused by a poor earphone-to-ear connection or by abnormal middle ear impedance, could be corrected with audiometers that measure sound pressures during hearing tests.

摘要

目的

确定正常中耳与病理中耳中耳机产生的耳道声压有何不同。

设计

比较了逸美蒂克研究公司(Etymtic Research)的ER-3A插入式耳机在正常耳(N = 12)中产生的耳道声压与在患有乳突切除术碗状物的异常耳(N = 15)、鼓膜造孔管(N = 5)和鼓膜穿孔(N = 5)的异常耳中产生的声压。使用泰利芬尼克斯公司(Telephonics)的TDH-49耳罩式耳机对正常耳(N = 10)以及患有乳突切除术碗状物的异常耳(N = 10)、鼓膜造孔管(N = 4)和鼓膜穿孔(N = 5)的异常耳进行了类似测量。

结果

对于插入式耳机,乳突碗状耳中产生的声压均小于正常耳中产生的声压;在250至1000赫兹之间,压力水平差异几乎与频率无关,范围为-3至-15分贝;在1000至4000赫兹之间,水平降低随频率增加,范围为-5分贝至-35分贝。在有鼓膜造孔管和穿孔的耳中,在1000赫兹以下的频率下,声压始终小于正常耳中的声压;最大差异出现在500赫兹以下,范围为-5至-25分贝。对于耳罩式耳机,三种病理状况下耳中的声压比插入式耳机的声压变化更大。一般来说,对于频率低于约500赫兹的情况,有乳突碗状物的耳中的声压低于正常耳中的声压;在约500赫兹以上,压力出现尖锐的最小值和最大值,这在正常耳中未出现。有鼓膜造孔管和鼓膜穿孔的耳在较低频率下也显示耳道压力降低,但在较高频率下,这些耳道压力通常与正常耳中测量的压力相似。

结论

当中耳不正常时,耳道声压可能与正常耳的值相差高达35分贝。由于在所研究的病理状况下压力水平通常会降低,因此测得的听力损失会大幅夸大耳朵敏感度的实际损失。这些变化取决于耳机、中耳病理状况和频率。耳道压力的不受控变化,无论是由耳机与耳朵的连接不良还是中耳阻抗异常引起的,都可以通过在听力测试期间测量声压的听力计来校正。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验