Friedman S M, Gelso C J
University of Maryland, College Park 20742-4411, USA.
J Clin Psychol. 2000 Sep;56(9):1221-35. doi: 10.1002/1097-4679(200009)56:9<1221::AID-JCLP8>3.0.CO;2-W.
A measure was developed to assess supervisor-perceived countertransference (CT) behavior during counseling sessions. Eleven experts provided face validity for the items, indicating that each item was at least somewhat an expression of countertransference. Exploratory factor analysis of ratings of 126 supervisors of supervisee counseling sessions revealed, as expected, the existence of two factors. However, rather than reflecting the dimensions of overinvolvement and underinvolvement as hypothesized, the factors were better captured by the terms Negative Countertransference and Positive Countertransference. The total scale and each subscale demonstrated high internal consistency. In addition, both positive and negative CT were found to relate positively with an existing one-item index of countertransference behavior and negatively with an existing measure of countertransference management ability. Research and clinical implications are discussed.
开发了一种测量方法来评估在咨询过程中主管所感知到的反移情（CT）行为。11位专家对这些项目进行了表面效度评估，表明每个项目至少在一定程度上是反移情的一种表现。对126名被督导者咨询过程的主管评分进行探索性因素分析，正如预期的那样，发现了两个因素。然而，这些因素并非如假设的那样反映过度卷入和卷入不足的维度，而是用“消极反移情”和“积极反移情”这两个术语能更好地描述。总量表和每个子量表都显示出较高的内部一致性。此外，发现积极和消极CT都与现有的一项反移情行为指标呈正相关，与现有的反移情管理能力测量指标呈负相关。讨论了研究和临床意义。
