Aziz E S, Samra A
Department of Anaesthesia, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Zamalek, Egypt.
Br J Anaesth. 2000 Aug;85(2):314-6. doi: 10.1093/bja/85.2.314.
We compared the efficacy of deep topical fornix nerve block anaesthesia (DTFNBA) versus peribulbar nerve block in patients undergoing cataract surgery using phacoemulsification. We studied 120 patients, allocated randomly to two groups. Group 1 (n = 60) received peribulbar block with 5 ml of a 1:1 mixture of 0.5% plain bupivacaine and 2% lidocaine supplemented with hyaluronidase 300 i.u. ml-1. Group 2 received DTFNBA with placement of a sponge soaked with 0.5% bupivacaine deep into the conjunctival fornices for 15 min. No sedation was given to either group. Analgesia was assessed by the reaction to insertion of the superior rectus suture and by questioning during the procedure. A three-point scoring system was used (no pain = 0, discomfort = 1, pain = 2). Scoring was repeated at keratotomy, hydrodissection and hydrodelineation, phacoemulsification, irrigation and aspiration, and at intraocular lens insertion. If the patient's pain score was 0 or 1, no further action was taken. If the pain score at any stage of the operation was 2, intracameral injection of 1% preservative-free lidocaine was given. One patient in Group 2 needed intracameral lidocaine at the stage of phacoemulsification (P > 0.05) and four experienced discomfort at irrigation and aspiration (P = 0.043). We conclude that DTFNBA may be a useful needle-free anaesthetic technique in patients undergoing cataract surgery using phacoemulsification.
我们比较了深度球结膜穹窿神经阻滞麻醉(DTFNBA)与球周神经阻滞在接受白内障超声乳化手术患者中的疗效。我们研究了120例患者,随机分为两组。第1组(n = 60)接受球周阻滞,注射5 ml由0.5%普通布比卡因和2%利多卡因按1:1混合并添加300 i.u. ml-1透明质酸酶的溶液。第2组接受DTFNBA,将浸有0.5%布比卡因的海绵深入结膜穹窿放置15分钟。两组均未给予镇静剂。通过对上直肌缝线插入的反应以及术中询问来评估镇痛效果。采用三分制评分系统(无疼痛=0,不适=1,疼痛=2)。在角膜切开、水分离和水分层、超声乳化、冲洗和抽吸以及人工晶状体植入时重复评分。如果患者的疼痛评分为0或1,则不采取进一步措施。如果手术任何阶段的疼痛评分为2,则前房内注射1%无防腐剂利多卡因。第2组有1例患者在超声乳化阶段需要前房内注射利多卡因(P>0.05),4例在冲洗和抽吸时感到不适(P = 0.043)。我们得出结论,DTFNBA可能是接受白内障超声乳化手术患者一种有用的无针麻醉技术。