Silvestro R, Silvestro C
Warwick Business School, University of Warwick, Coventry, England.
J Adv Nurs. 2000 Sep;32(3):525-35. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.2000.01512.x.
An evaluation of nurse rostering practices in the National Health Service The scheduling of nursing time on hospital wards is critical to the delivery of patient care, resource utilization and employee satisfaction. Over the past decade many hospital wards in the United Kingdom (UK) have moved away from the traditional planning of rosters by a single manager, towards more participative processes known as self-rostering and team rostering. This paper tests the hypothesis, developed from the literature, that the three types of rostering approach may be positioned along a continuum. Self-rostering at one extreme, is conducive to staff empowerment, motivation and roster effectiveness, whilst departmental rostering, at the other, leads to perceived autocracy, reduced empowerment, lower levels of staff motivation and roster effectiveness. Team rostering is positioned mid-way on this continuum. This paper reports the findings of an empirical study of nurse rostering practices in the UK National Health Service (NHS), with a view to developing an understanding of the implications of implementing these three rostering approaches and testing the above hypothesis. The survey of rostering practices in 50 NHS wards, and in-depth case studies of seven wards, revealed that each of the three rostering approaches has benefits and limitations and a picture emerges quite different from that implied by the research hypothesis. Whilst the literature suggests that the choice of rostering approach determines the level of perceived autocracy, staff motivation and roster effectiveness, it is proposed in this paper that selection of rostering approach should be contingent upon operational context. The paper concludes with a framework which stipulates that the choice of rostering approach for a ward should be determined on the basis of four contingent variables, namely, ward size, demand variability, demand predictability, and complexity of skill mix. It is recommended that departmental rostering be applied in large wards with complex rostering problems, whilst team rostering is more appropriate for medium sized wards, and self-rostering appropriate for small wards.
英国国民医疗服务体系中护士排班实践的评估 医院病房护理时间的安排对于提供患者护理、资源利用和员工满意度至关重要。在过去十年中,英国许多医院病房已从由单一管理人员进行传统排班规划,转向更为参与式的流程,即自我排班和团队排班。本文检验了从文献中得出的假设,即这三种排班方法可能处于一个连续统一体上。一端是自我排班,有利于员工赋权、激励和排班效率,而另一端的部门排班则会导致专制感、赋权减少、员工积极性水平降低和排班效率低下。团队排班则处于这个连续统一体的中间位置。本文报告了对英国国民医疗服务体系(NHS)护士排班实践的实证研究结果,旨在了解实施这三种排班方法的影响并检验上述假设。对50个NHS病房的排班实践进行的调查以及对7个病房的深入案例研究表明,这三种排班方法各有优缺点,呈现出的情况与研究假设所暗示的截然不同。虽然文献表明排班方法的选择决定了专制感、员工积极性和排班效率的水平,但本文提出排班方法的选择应视运营环境而定。本文最后得出一个框架,规定病房排班方法的选择应基于四个偶然变量,即病房规模、需求可变性、需求可预测性和技能组合的复杂性。建议在排班问题复杂的大型病房采用部门排班,而团队排班更适合中型病房,自我排班适合小型病房。