Murray E, Gruppen L, Catton P, Hays R, Woolliscroft J O
Department of Primary Care and Population Sciences, Royal Free and University College Medical School, University College London, UK.
Med Educ. 2000 Oct;34(10):871-9. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2923.2000.00757.x.
Medical education is not exempt from increasing societal expectations of accountability. Competition for financial resources requires medical educators to demonstrate cost-effective educational practice; health care practitioners, the products of medical education programmes, must meet increasing standards of professionalism; the culture of evidence-based medicine demands an evaluation of the effect educational programmes have on health care and service delivery. Educators cannot demonstrate that graduates possess the required attributes, or that their programmes have the desired impact on health care without appropriate assessment tools and measures of outcome.
To determine to what extent currently available assessment approaches can measure potentially relevant medical education outcomes addressing practitioner performance, health care delivery and population health, in order to highlight areas in need of research and development.
Illustrative publications about desirable professional behaviour were synthesized to obtain examples of required competencies and health outcomes. A MEDLINE search for available assessment tools and measures of health outcome was performed.
There are extensive tools for assessing clinical skills and knowledge. Some work has been done on the use of professional judgement for assessing professional behaviours; scholarship; and multiprofessional team working; but much more is needed. Very little literature exists on assessing group attributes of professionals, such as clinical governance, evidence-based practice and workforce allocation, and even less on examining individual patient or population health indices.
The challenge facing medical educators is to develop new tools, many of which will rely on professional judgement, for assessing these broader competencies and outcomes.
医学教育也未能幸免于社会对问责制日益增长的期望。对财政资源的竞争要求医学教育工作者展示具有成本效益的教育实践;作为医学教育项目产物的医疗从业者必须达到日益提高的专业标准;循证医学文化要求评估教育项目对医疗保健和服务提供的影响。如果没有适当的评估工具和结果衡量指标,教育工作者就无法证明毕业生具备所需的属性,或者他们的项目对医疗保健有预期的影响。
确定目前可用的评估方法在多大程度上能够衡量与从业者表现、医疗保健提供和人群健康相关的潜在医学教育结果,以突出需要研发的领域。
综合有关理想职业行为的说明性出版物,以获取所需能力和健康结果的示例。对MEDLINE进行检索,查找可用的评估工具和健康结果衡量指标。
有大量用于评估临床技能和知识的工具。在使用专业判断来评估职业行为、学术成就和多专业团队协作方面已经开展了一些工作,但仍有更多工作需要做。关于评估专业人员的群体属性(如临床治理、循证实践和劳动力分配)的文献非常少,而关于检查个体患者或人群健康指标的文献更少。
医学教育工作者面临的挑战是开发新的工具,其中许多将依赖专业判断,以评估这些更广泛的能力和结果。