McCullough J P, Klein D N, Keller M B, Holzer C E, Davis S M, Kornstein S G, Howland R H, Thase M E, Harrison W M
Department of Psychology, Virginia Commonwealth University 23284-2018, USA.
J Abnorm Psychol. 2000 Aug;109(3):419-27.
The nosology of chronic depression has become increasingly complex since the publication of the revised third edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-III-R; American Psychiatric Association, 1987), but there are few data available to evaluate the validity of the distinctions between the subtypes of chronic depression. The validity of the distinction between DSM-III-R chronic major depression (CMD) and major depression superimposed on dysthymia (double depression, DD) was examined. Participants were 635 patients with chronic depression in a 12-week trial of antidepressant medications. Patients with CMD, DD, and a 3rd group with a chronic major depressive episode superimposed on dysthymia (DD/CMD) were compared on demographic and clinical characteristics, family history, and response to treatment. Few differences were evident, although the depression of patients with DD/CMD tended to be more severe.
自《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第三版修订版(DSM-III-R;美国精神病学协会,1987年)出版以来,慢性抑郁症的分类学变得越来越复杂,但几乎没有数据可用于评估慢性抑郁症各亚型之间区别的有效性。本研究检验了DSM-III-R中慢性重度抑郁症(CMD)与恶劣心境障碍叠加的重度抑郁症(双重抑郁症,DD)之间区别的有效性。在一项为期12周的抗抑郁药物试验中,635名患有慢性抑郁症的患者参与了研究。对CMD患者、DD患者以及第三组即恶劣心境障碍叠加慢性重度抑郁发作(DD/CMD)的患者,就人口统计学和临床特征、家族史以及治疗反应进行了比较。尽管DD/CMD患者的抑郁往往更严重,但几乎没有明显差异。