Hanse Institute for Advanced Study Delmenhorst, Germany ; Department for Psychology, Alpen-Adria-Universität Klagenfurt Klagenfurt, Austria.
Hanse Institute for Advanced Study Delmenhorst, Germany ; Department of Neurology, University of Lübeck Lübeck, Germany.
Front Hum Neurosci. 2013 Dec 4;7:812. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00812. eCollection 2013.
The heterogeneity between patients with depression cannot be captured adequately with existing descriptive systems of diagnosis and neurobiological models of depression. Furthermore, considering the highly individual nature of depression, the application of general stimuli in past research efforts may not capture the essence of the disorder. This study aims to identify subtypes of depression by using empirically derived personality syndromes, and to explore neural correlates of the derived personality syndromes.
In the present exploratory study, an individually tailored and psychodynamically based functional magnetic resonance imaging paradigm using dysfunctional relationship patterns was presented to 20 chronically depressed patients. RESULTS from the Shedler-Westen Assessment Procedure (SWAP-200) were analyzed by Q-factor analysis to identify clinically relevant subgroups of depression and related brain activation.
The principle component analysis of SWAP-200 items from all 20 patients lead to a two-factor solution: "Depressive Personality" and "Emotional-Hostile-Externalizing Personality." Both factors were used in a whole-brain correlational analysis but only the second factor yielded significant positive correlations in four regions: a large cluster in the right orbitofrontal cortex (OFC), the left ventral striatum, a small cluster in the left temporal pole, and another small cluster in the right middle frontal gyrus.
The degree to which patients with depression score high on the factor "Emotional-Hostile-Externalizing Personality" correlated with relatively higher activity in three key areas involved in emotion processing, evaluation of reward/punishment, negative cognitions, depressive pathology, and social knowledge (OFC, ventral striatum, temporal pole). RESULTS may contribute to an alternative description of neural correlates of depression showing differential brain activation dependent on the extent of specific personality syndromes in depression.
现有的诊断描述系统和抑郁症的神经生物学模型无法充分捕捉到抑郁症患者之间的异质性。此外,考虑到抑郁症的高度个体性,过去研究工作中应用的一般刺激可能无法捕捉到该疾病的本质。本研究旨在通过使用经验衍生的人格综合征来确定抑郁症的亚型,并探索衍生的人格综合征的神经相关性。
在本探索性研究中,对 20 名慢性抑郁症患者使用个性化和基于心理动力学的功能磁共振成像范式,使用功能失调的人际关系模式。通过 Shedler-Westen 评估程序(SWAP-200)的结果进行 Q 因子分析,以识别抑郁的临床相关亚组和相关的大脑激活。
对所有 20 名患者的 SWAP-200 项目进行的主成分分析得出了两个因素解决方案:“抑郁人格”和“情绪敌对-外化人格”。这两个因素都用于全脑相关分析,但只有第二个因素在四个区域中产生了显著的正相关:右侧眶额皮层(OFC)的一个大簇,左侧腹侧纹状体,左侧颞极的一个小簇,以及右侧中额叶的另一个小簇。
抑郁症患者在“情绪敌对-外化人格”因素上的得分程度与三个关键区域的相对较高的活动相关,这三个区域涉及情绪处理、奖励/惩罚评估、消极认知、抑郁病理和社会知识(OFC、腹侧纹状体、颞极)。结果可能有助于对抑郁的神经相关性进行替代描述,显示出与抑郁中特定人格综合征的程度相关的不同大脑激活。