Vitolins M Z, Rand C S, Rapp S R, Ribisl P M, Sevick M A
Department of Public Health Sciences, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC 27157, USA.
Control Clin Trials. 2000 Oct;21(5 Suppl):188S-94S. doi: 10.1016/s0197-2456(00)00077-5.
Measuring adherence to medical and behavioral interventions is important to clinicians and researchers since inadequate adherence can reduce the effectiveness of an intervention. Unfortunately, there is no gold standard for measuring adherence across health behaviors. Adherence needs to be defined situationally with parameters of acceptable adherence carefully delineated and appropriate to the health behavior being studied. Additionally, measurement methods must be valid, reliable, and sensitive to change; this paper reviews these criteria. Methods used to measure adherence to dietary interventions include 24-hour recalls, food diaries, and food frequency questionnaires. Direct and indirect calorimetry, doubly labeled water, and a variety of self-report methods can be used to measure adherence in physical activity interventions. Adherence to pharmacological interventions is assessed using self-report methods, biochemical measures, medication counts, and the automated pharmacy database review strategy. The strengths and weaknesses of these methods for measuring adherence to dietary, physical activity, and pharmacological interventions are reviewed. Control Clin Trials 2000;21:188S-194S
对临床医生和研究人员而言,测量对医学及行为干预措施的依从性很重要,因为依从性不足会降低干预措施的效果。不幸的是,对于衡量各种健康行为的依从性,尚无金标准。依从性需要根据具体情况进行定义,仔细划定可接受依从性的参数,且这些参数要适合所研究的健康行为。此外,测量方法必须有效、可靠且对变化敏感;本文将对这些标准进行综述。用于测量饮食干预依从性的方法包括24小时膳食回顾、食物日记和食物频率问卷。直接和间接量热法、双标水法以及多种自我报告方法可用于测量体育活动干预中的依从性。使用自我报告方法、生化指标、药物计数和自动药房数据库审查策略来评估药物治疗干预的依从性。本文将对这些测量饮食、体育活动和药物治疗干预依从性方法的优缺点进行综述。《对照临床试验》2000年;21:188S - 194S