• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

阿替洛尔治疗心绞痛每日一次。

Atenolol once daily in angina.

作者信息

Mäkynen P, Karhumäki L, Seppänen S

出版信息

Ann Clin Res. 1979 Apr;11(2):53-7.

PMID:110212
Abstract

Both atenolol 50 mg daily (A-50) and atenolol 100 mg daily (A-100) significantly reduced the angina attacks per week compared with placebo (p less than 0.05). Nitroglycerine consumption was less on A-50 (p less than 0.05) and on A-100 (p less than 0.025) than on placebo. There was no difference between the atenolol dosages in these respects. In comparison with placebo, atenolol gave a significant increase in total work performed until the appearance of 1 mm ST segment depression in bicycle exercise tests made between 3--4 p.m. (A-50: p less than 0.05; A-100: p less than 0.0017). The rate-pressure products (systolic BP X heart rate X 10(-2) at 6' at 30 W) was 163.5 +/- 12.5 (S.E.) on placebo. It diminished to 129.8 +/- 7.9 on A-50 (p less than 0.01) and to 113.9 +/- 6.6 on A-100 (p less than 0.001). The effect of A-100 on the rate-pressure product was stronger than that of A-50 (p less than 0.05). Relative heart volume did not change on A-50 compared with placebo but A-100 resulted in a slight enlargement of 22 ml/m2 BSA when compared to placebo (p less than 0.01). Side effects were minimal.

摘要

与安慰剂相比,每日服用50毫克阿替洛尔(A - 50)和每日服用100毫克阿替洛尔(A - 100)均显著减少每周心绞痛发作次数(p小于0.05)。A - 50(p小于0.05)和A -A - 100(p小于0.025)组的硝酸甘油消耗量均低于安慰剂组。在这些方面,阿替洛尔不同剂量之间无差异。与安慰剂相比,在下午3 - 4点进行的自行车运动试验中,直至出现1毫米ST段压低时,阿替洛尔显著增加了总做功量(A - 50:p小于0.05;A - 100:p小于0.0017)。安慰剂组在30瓦功率下6分钟时的速率 - 压力乘积(收缩压×心率×10⁻²)为163.5±12.5(标准误)。在A - 50组降至129.8±7.9(p小于0.01),在A - 100组降至113.9±6.6(p小于0.001)。A - 100对速率 - 压力乘积的作用强于A - 50(p小于0.05)。与安慰剂相比,A - 50组的相对心脏容积无变化,但与安慰剂相比,A - 100组导致每平方米体表面积轻微增大22毫升(p小于0.01)。副作用极小。

相似文献

1
Atenolol once daily in angina.阿替洛尔治疗心绞痛每日一次。
Ann Clin Res. 1979 Apr;11(2):53-7.
2
Antianginal effects of atenolol and pindolol in patients with stable effort angina pectoris.阿替洛尔与吲哚洛尔对稳定型劳力性心绞痛患者的抗心绞痛作用。
Zhongguo Yao Li Xue Bao. 1989 May;10(3):222-6.
3
[Effect of atenolol and nitroglycerin ointment on exertion tolerance in coronary disease].[阿替洛尔与硝酸甘油软膏对冠心病运动耐量的影响]
Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 1983 Nov 25;108(47):1798-803. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1069829.
4
Effect of atenolol in angina pectoris of effort.阿替洛尔对劳力型心绞痛的作用。
Cor Vasa. 1972;20(2):99-103.
5
Once daily atenolol (Tenormine) in the treatment of angina pectoris. Observations on clinical efficacy, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics.每日一次阿替洛尔(氨酰心安)治疗心绞痛。临床疗效、药代动力学及药效学观察。
Eur J Cardiol. 1979 Jun;9(6):419-35.
6
Long-term treatment of angina pectoris with bisoprolol or atenolol in patients with chronic obstructive bronchitis: a randomized, double-blind crossover study.比索洛尔或阿替洛尔对慢性阻塞性支气管炎患者心绞痛的长期治疗:一项随机、双盲交叉研究。
J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1990;16 Suppl 5:S36-44.
7
[Evaluation by exercise test of effects of a single oral dose of atenolol in patients with stable angina (author's transl)].单次口服阿替洛尔对稳定型心绞痛患者影响的运动试验评估(作者译)
G Ital Cardiol. 1981;11(12):2088-96.
8
Randomised, double-blind, three-way cross-over study of dilevalol 200 and 400 mg and atenolol 100 mg once-daily in patients with chronic stable angina pectoris.慢性稳定型心绞痛患者中,地来洛尔200毫克和400毫克以及阿替洛尔100毫克每日一次的随机、双盲、三向交叉研究。
J Hum Hypertens. 1990 Jun;4 Suppl 2:85-90.
9
Comparative efficacy of ranolazine versus atenolol for chronic angina pectoris.雷诺嗪与阿替洛尔治疗慢性心绞痛的疗效比较
Am J Cardiol. 2005 Feb 1;95(3):311-6. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2004.09.025.
10
[Atenolol in the treatment of angina pectoris].阿替洛尔治疗心绞痛
Schweiz Med Wochenschr. 1979 Dec 8;109(47):1857-60.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of once and twice daily sotalol in exercise-induced angina pectoris.每日一次与每日两次索他洛尔治疗运动诱发性心绞痛的比较。
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1982;21(6):461-5. doi: 10.1007/BF00542039.