Amador X F, Paul-Odouard R
Department of Psychology, New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York 10032, USA.
Psychiatr Q. 2000 Winter;71(4):363-71. doi: 10.1023/a:1004688324430.
The use of recent psychiatric research in the defense of the 'Unabomber' (United States vs. Theodore Kaczynski) is a compelling example of how the gap between research and practice can have profound consequences on the practice of forensic psychiatry, psychology and the judicial process. In this case, educating the lawyers and the court about the research on poor insight in schizophrenia changed the defense strategy and ultimately the course of the trial.
在“大学炸弹客案”(美国诉西奥多·卡辛斯基)中运用近期的精神病学研究,是一个极具说服力的例子,它表明研究与实践之间的差距会如何对法医精神病学、心理学实践以及司法程序产生深远影响。在这个案件中,向律师和法庭介绍关于精神分裂症患者自知力缺失的研究,改变了辩护策略,并最终影响了审判进程。