• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

紧急围产期子宫切除术的适应证与结局:一项五年回顾

Indications for and outcomes of emergency peripartum hysterectomy. A five-year review.

作者信息

Bakshi S, Meyer B A

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Medical Center, State University of New York at Stony Brook 11794-8091, USA.

出版信息

J Reprod Med. 2000 Sep;45(9):733-7.

PMID:11027082
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To review risk factors, management and outcomes of emergency peripartum hysterectomy performed in the last five years at Stony Brook University Hospital.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective descriptive and cohort analyses from January 1990 to January 1995. Incidences of emergency peripartum hysterectomy and placenta accreta were determined. Relative risks of hysterectomy for specified risk factors were calculated.

RESULTS

There were 39 cases of emergency peripartum hysterectomy, for an overall incidence of 2.7/1,000 births. Indications for emergency hysterectomy were placenta accreta, unspecified bleeding, uterine rupture, myomas and atony with placenta accreta, the most common. The crude relative risk of emergency hysterectomy was 46.9 (n = 37) for cesarean delivery, 15.24 (n = 31) for prior cesarean delivery and 110.83 (n = 21) for placenta previa.

CONCLUSION

Cesarean delivery, prior cesarean delivery, placenta accreta and uterine atony were identified as risk factors for emergency peripartum hysterectomy, and abnormal placentation was the primary cause of cesarean hysterectomy.

摘要

目的

回顾过去五年在石溪大学医院进行的急诊剖宫产子宫切除术的危险因素、管理及结果。

研究设计

对1990年1月至1995年1月进行回顾性描述性和队列分析。确定急诊剖宫产子宫切除术和胎盘植入的发生率。计算特定危险因素子宫切除的相对风险。

结果

有39例急诊剖宫产子宫切除术,总发生率为2.7/1000例分娩。急诊子宫切除的指征为胎盘植入、不明原因出血、子宫破裂、肌瘤和伴有胎盘植入的宫缩乏力,其中最常见的是胎盘植入。剖宫产的急诊子宫切除粗相对风险为46.9(n = 37),既往剖宫产为15.24(n = 31),前置胎盘为110.83(n = 21)。

结论

剖宫产、既往剖宫产、胎盘植入和子宫收缩乏力被确定为急诊剖宫产子宫切除术的危险因素,胎盘植入异常是剖宫产子宫切除的主要原因。

相似文献

1
Indications for and outcomes of emergency peripartum hysterectomy. A five-year review.紧急围产期子宫切除术的适应证与结局:一项五年回顾
J Reprod Med. 2000 Sep;45(9):733-7.
2
Emergency peripartum hysterectomy: a 9-year review.急诊围产期子宫切除术:9年回顾
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2006 May;274(2):84-7. doi: 10.1007/s00404-006-0124-4. Epub 2006 Feb 7.
3
Indication of emergency peripartum hysterectomy: review of 17 cases.紧急围产期子宫切除术的指征:17例病例回顾
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2003 Aug;268(3):131-5. doi: 10.1007/s00404-003-0494-9. Epub 2003 May 20.
4
Emergency peripartum hysterectomy in Northern Jordan: indications and obstetric outcome (an 8-year review).约旦北部围产期紧急子宫切除术:指征与产科结局(一项8年回顾)
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2004 Dec;270(4):271-3. doi: 10.1007/s00404-003-0563-0. Epub 2003 Dec 16.
5
Peripartum hysterectomy and associated factors.产后子宫切除术及相关因素。
J Reprod Med. 2003 Mar;48(3):148-52.
6
Peripartum hysterectomy in a teaching hospital in the eastern region of Turkey.土耳其东部地区一家教学医院的围产期子宫切除术。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2005 May 1;120(1):57-62. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2004.08.011.
7
Peripartum hysterectomy in Aba southeastern Nigeria.尼日利亚东南部阿坝地区的围产期子宫切除术
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2008 Dec;48(6):580-2. doi: 10.1111/j.1479-828X.2008.00905.x.
8
Emergency peripartum hysterectomy: a comparison of cesarean and postpartum hysterectomy.急诊围产期子宫切除术:剖宫产子宫切除术与产后子宫切除术的比较
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004 May;190(5):1440-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2004.02.021.
9
Peripartum hysterectomy: 1999 to 2006.围产期子宫切除术:1999年至2006年。
Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Mar;111(3):732-8. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31816569f2.
10
Emergency peripartum hysterectomy: A prospective study in The Netherlands.紧急围产期子宫切除术:荷兰的一项前瞻性研究。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2006 Feb 1;124(2):187-92. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2005.06.012. Epub 2005 Jul 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Embracing the mental health challenges of uterus transplant candidates.正视子宫移植候选者的心理健康挑战。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2025 Mar;104(3):540-547. doi: 10.1111/aogs.15038. Epub 2025 Jan 16.
2
Uterine Factor Infertility, a Systematic Review.子宫因素导致的不孕症:一项系统综述
J Clin Med. 2022 Aug 21;11(16):4907. doi: 10.3390/jcm11164907.
3
Emergency hysterectomy in a tertiary care hospital: indications, surgical outcomes and challenges: a 2-year retrospective descriptive cross-sectional study.三级保健医院的紧急子宫切除术:适应证、手术结果和挑战:一项为期 2 年的回顾性描述性横断面研究。
Pan Afr Med J. 2020 Oct 1;37:106. doi: 10.11604/pamj.2020.37.106.25393. eCollection 2020.
4
Emergency peripartum hysterectomy at Jordan University hospital - a teaching hospital experience.约旦大学医院的急诊围产期子宫切除术——一家教学医院的经验
Prz Menopauzalny. 2020 Jul;19(2):66-71. doi: 10.5114/pm.2020.97840. Epub 2020 Jul 13.
5
Emergency peripartum hysterectomy: A great obstetric challenge.紧急围产期子宫切除术:一项巨大的产科挑战。
Pak J Med Sci. 2018 Nov-Dec;34(6):1567-1570. doi: 10.12669/pjms.346.13686.
6
Emergency peripartum hysterectomy in the Dubai health system: A fifteen year experience.迪拜医疗系统中的紧急围产期子宫切除术:十五年经验
Turk J Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Mar;15(1):1-7. doi: 10.4274/tjod.55492. Epub 2018 Mar 28.
7
Emergency Peripartum Hysterectomy: A Multicenter Study of Incidence, Indications and Outcomes in Southwestern Nigeria.紧急围产期子宫切除术:尼日利亚西南部发病率、指征及结局的多中心研究
Matern Child Health J. 2016 Jun;20(6):1230-6. doi: 10.1007/s10995-016-1924-1.
8
Emergency peripartum hysterectomy in Isfahan; maternal mortality and morbidity rates among the women who underwent peripartum hysterectomy.伊斯法罕地区的紧急围产期子宫切除术;接受围产期子宫切除术妇女的孕产妇死亡率和发病率
Adv Biomed Res. 2013 Mar 6;2:20. doi: 10.4103/2277-9175.108004. Print 2013.
9
Emergency peripartum hysterectomy: Incidence, indications, risk factors and outcome.紧急围产期子宫切除术:发病率、适应症、危险因素及结局
N Am J Med Sci. 2011 Aug;3(8):358-61. doi: 10.4297/najms.2011.358.
10
The possible correlation between the patient's immune tolerance level during cesaerean section and the incidence of subsequent emergency peripartum hysterectomy.剖宫产术中患者免疫耐受水平与随后围产期紧急子宫切除术发生率之间的可能相关性。
Clin Dev Immunol. 2007;2007:63596. doi: 10.1155/2007/63596.