Fliege H, Filipp S H
Medizinische Klinik mit Schwerpunkt Psychosomatik Charité, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin.
Z Gerontol Geriatr. 2000 Aug;33(4):307-13. doi: 10.1007/s003910070051.
Following a subject-centred perspective in the research of happiness we asked N = 26 subjects aged 65 to 74 years in semistructured interviews about their subjective theories on happiness and quality of life (QOL) (subjective contents of the terms; description of a happy person; open wishes; causal attributions; control beliefs). Content analyses resulted in 28 categories that are united into 5 domains (personal resources, social resources and interaction, activity, material and environmental resources, abstract definitions). Particular aspects in content that have not yet been reported in the literature can be interpreted as notions of happiness and QOL specific to the elderly. Differences between the subjective concepts of "happiness" versus "QOL" are described. Ratings of semantic distance between the concepts "happiness", "QOL", "satisfaction", and "health" are analysed by multidimensional scaling. According to that, subjective representations of "happiness" and "QOL" vary markedly.
在幸福研究中遵循以主体为中心的视角，我们对26名年龄在65至74岁之间的受试者进行了半结构化访谈，询问他们关于幸福和生活质量（QOL）的主观理论（这些术语的主观内容；幸福之人的描述；公开的愿望；因果归因；控制信念）。内容分析得出了28个类别，这些类别被整合为5个领域（个人资源、社会资源与互动、活动、物质与环境资源、抽象定义）。文献中尚未报道的内容中的特定方面可被解释为老年人特有的幸福和生活质量观念。描述了“幸福”与“生活质量”主观概念之间的差异。通过多维尺度分析对“幸福”“生活质量”“满意度”和“健康”概念之间的语义距离评级进行了分析。据此，“幸福”和“生活质量”的主观表征差异显著。
