• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

跨越时间和文化的幸福观念。

Concepts of happiness across time and cultures.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22904-4400, USA.

出版信息

Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2013 May;39(5):559-77. doi: 10.1177/0146167213480042.

DOI:10.1177/0146167213480042
PMID:23599280
Abstract

We explored cultural and historical variations in concepts of happiness. First, we analyzed the definitions of happiness in dictionaries from 30 nations to understand cultural similarities and differences in happiness concepts. Second, we analyzed the definition of happiness in Webster's dictionaries from 1850 to the present day to understand historical changes in American English. Third, we coded the State of the Union addresses given by U.S. presidents from 1790 to 2010. Finally, we investigated the appearance of the phrases happy nation versus happy person in Google's Ngram Viewer from 1800 to 2008. Across cultures and time, happiness was most frequently defined as good luck and favorable external conditions. However, in American English, this definition was replaced by definitions focused on favorable internal feeling states. Our findings highlight the value of a historical perspective in the study of psychological concepts.

摘要

我们探讨了幸福概念在文化和历史上的差异。首先,我们分析了来自 30 个国家的词典中对幸福的定义,以了解幸福概念在文化上的异同。其次,我们分析了从 1850 年至今韦氏词典中对幸福的定义,以了解美国英语中幸福概念的历史变化。第三,我们对 1790 年至 2010 年美国总统的国情咨文进行了编码。最后,我们在谷歌 Ngram Viewer 中调查了从 1800 年到 2008 年“幸福的国家”与“幸福的个人”这两个短语的出现情况。跨越文化和时间,幸福最常被定义为好运和有利的外部条件。然而,在美国英语中,这个定义被侧重于有利的内部感觉状态的定义所取代。我们的研究结果强调了在研究心理概念时采用历史视角的重要性。

相似文献

1
Concepts of happiness across time and cultures.跨越时间和文化的幸福观念。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2013 May;39(5):559-77. doi: 10.1177/0146167213480042.
2
I am so happy 'cause my friend is happy for me: capitalization, friendship, and happiness among U.S. and Turkish college students.我很高兴,因为我的朋友为我感到高兴:美国和土耳其大学生中的大写、友谊和幸福。
J Soc Psychol. 2013 Mar-Apr;153(2):250-5. doi: 10.1080/00224545.2012.714814.
3
Happiness and unhappiness in east and west: themes and variations.东西方的幸福与不幸:主题与变奏
Emotion. 2009 Aug;9(4):441-56. doi: 10.1037/a0015634.
4
The religion paradox: if religion makes people happy, why are so many dropping out?宗教悖论:如果宗教能让人感到幸福,为什么那么多人选择退出?
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2011 Dec;101(6):1278-90. doi: 10.1037/a0024402. Epub 2011 Aug 1.
5
Friendship, perceived mattering and happiness: a study of American and Turkish college students.友谊、被感知的重要性和幸福感:对美国和土耳其大学生的研究。
J Soc Psychol. 2012 Sep-Oct;152(5):659-64. doi: 10.1080/00224545.2011.650237.
6
A cross-cultural investigation into the relationships among parental support for basic psychological needs, sense of uniqueness, and happiness.跨文化调查父母对基本心理需求的支持、独特感与幸福感之间的关系。
J Psychol. 2014 Jul-Aug;148(4):387-411. doi: 10.1080/00223980.2013.805115.
7
Are virtuous people happy all around the world? Civic virtue, antisocial punishment, and subjective well-being across cultures.世界各地都是品德高尚的人更快乐吗?公民美德、反社会惩罚与跨文化的主观幸福感。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2013 Jul;39(7):927-42. doi: 10.1177/0146167213485902. Epub 2013 Apr 23.
8
Social skills, friendship and happiness: a cross-cultural investigation.社交技能、友谊与幸福感:一项跨文化研究
J Soc Psychol. 2012 May-Jun;152(3):379-85. doi: 10.1080/00224545.2011.591451.
9
Perceived happiness of college students measured by Maslow's hierarchy of needs.用马斯洛需求层次理论衡量的大学生感知幸福度。
Psychol Rep. 1996 Dec;79(3 Pt 1):759-62. doi: 10.2466/pr0.1996.79.3.759.
10
[Subjective theories on luck and quality of life--results of explorative interviews with 65- to 74-year-old probands].[关于运气与生活质量的主观理论——对65至74岁被试者进行探索性访谈的结果]
Z Gerontol Geriatr. 2000 Aug;33(4):307-13. doi: 10.1007/s003910070051.

引用本文的文献

1
General happiness index of a repeated cross-sectional survey among the general population from 2018 to 2024 in Hong Kong: A data note.2018年至2024年香港普通人群重复横断面调查的总体幸福指数:数据说明
BMC Res Notes. 2025 Jul 25;18(1):323. doi: 10.1186/s13104-025-07399-6.
2
The linguocultural concept of /pandemic/пaндeмия in Chinese, English, and Russian linguistic consciousness.中文、英文和俄文语言意识中“大流行”/pandemic/пaндeмия的语言文化概念。
Philos Ethics Humanit Med. 2025 Jul 9;20(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s13010-025-00168-0.
3
The chronospatial revolution in psychology.
心理学中的时空革命。
Nat Hum Behav. 2025 Jun 2. doi: 10.1038/s41562-025-02229-y.
4
Translation and Validation of the Malayalam Version of the Subjective Happiness Scale.《主观幸福感量表马拉雅拉姆语版本的翻译与验证》
Soc Indic Res. 2025;176(1):245-255. doi: 10.1007/s11205-024-03448-y. Epub 2024 Oct 22.
5
Psychological Traditionality and Modernity and Happiness: The Different Happiness Levels in Chinese Students.心理传统性与现代性和幸福感:中国学生的不同幸福水平
Behav Sci (Basel). 2024 Apr 8;14(4):304. doi: 10.3390/bs14040304.
6
Distinct associations between gratitude, self-esteem, and optimism with subjective and psychological well-being among Japanese individuals.在日本个体中,感恩、自尊和乐观与主观幸福感和心理幸福感之间存在明显的关联。
BMC Psychol. 2024 Mar 7;12(1):130. doi: 10.1186/s40359-024-01606-y.
7
Happiness Maximization Is a WEIRD Way of Living.将幸福最大化是一种怪异的生活方式。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2024 Feb 13:17456916231208367. doi: 10.1177/17456916231208367.
8
When Happiness is Both Joy and Purpose: The Complexity of the Pursuit of Happiness and Well-Being is Related to Actual Well-Being.当幸福兼具喜悦和意义时:追求幸福与福祉的复杂性与实际福祉相关。
J Happiness Stud. 2022;23(7):3233-3261. doi: 10.1007/s10902-022-00541-2. Epub 2022 Jun 10.
9
How Does Public Health Investment Affect Subjective Well-Being? Empirical Evidence from China.公共卫生投资如何影响主观幸福感?来自中国的实证证据。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Apr 21;19(9):5035. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19095035.
10
The Mediating Effect of Nature Restorativeness, Stress Level, and Nature Connectedness in the Association between Nature Exposure and Quality of Life.自然修复性、压力水平和与自然的连接在自然接触与生活质量之间的关系中的中介作用。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Feb 13;19(4):2098. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19042098.