Logistic advantages of four-section helical CT in the abdomen and pelvis.

BACKGROUND

Multisection helical computed tomography (CT) has the potential for providing data sets with better section profiles, more anatomic coverage, and shorter breath-holding periods. Our purpose was to quantitate these advantages in a clinical setting when imaging the abdomen and pelvis.

METHODS

CT parameters including collimation, timing, z-axis coverage, and milliamperes were gathered retrospectively for the image set of both single-section (GE CT/i with 0.8-s rotation) and four-section (GE QX/i Lightspeed with 0.8-s rotation) helical CT scanners. Data were recorded for the abdomen and pelvis CT (n = 30 each), dual-phase liver CT including the pelvis (n = 15 each), and dual-phase pancreas CT (n = 15 each).

RESULTS

The abdominal and pelvic CT averaged 128.4 +/- 5.4 s for single-section scanners (70-s delay, two breath-holds of 21.1 and 17. 7 s with a 19.5-s interscan delay) and 92.2 +/- 2.2 s for the four-section scanner (70-s delay and a 22.2-s breath-hold; p < 0. 0001). For the dual liver and pelvis CT, single-section scanners averaged 119.9 +/- 7.5 s (30-s delay, 15.8-s arterial phase, 20.0-s interscan delay, 21.2-s venous phase, 19.5-s interscan delay, and 14. 2 s for the remaining abdomen and pelvis), whereas the four-section scanner averaged 86.8 +/- 2.5 s (30-s delay, 6.7-s arterial phase, 27.9-s interscan delay, and 21.8-s venous phase including the pelvis; p < 0.0001). For the dual pancreas CT, single-section scanners averaged 86.7 +/- 2.5 s (20-s delay, 28.3-s arterial phase, 17.8-s interscan delay, 21.7-s venous phase), whereas the four-section scanner averaged 78.0 +/- 2.9 s (20-s delay, 9.7-s arterial phase, 30.7-s interscan delay, 13.0-s venous phase; p < 0. 0001).

CONCLUSION

CT scanners having four-section technology can reduce overall data acquisition times by 10-30% and total milliamperes by 50-60% depending on the protocol with thinner slice profiles.