Suppr超能文献

测量哮喘控制情况。临床问卷还是日常日记?

Measuring asthma control. Clinic questionnaire or daily diary?

作者信息

Juniper E F, O'Byrne P M, Ferrie P J, King D R, Roberts J N

机构信息

Departments of Medicine and Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University Faculty of Health Sciences, Hamilton, London, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2000 Oct;162(4 Pt 1):1330-4. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.162.4.9912138.

Abstract

Daily symptom, peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR), and medication diaries are often used in clinical trials of treatments for asthma on the assumption that they provide a better estimate of clinical status than does a questionnaire completed in the clinic. We conducted a study with the aim of comparing the measurement properties of the clinic-completed Asthma Control Questionnaire with those of the Asthma Control Diary. The diary is composed of questions and response options almost identical to those of the questionnaire, but uses PEFR instead of FEV(1) as the measure of airway caliber. In an observational study, 50 adults with symptomatic asthma attended a McMaster University asthma clinic at 0, 1, 5, and 9 wk to complete the Asthma Control Questionnaire and other measures of asthma status. For 1 wk before each follow-up visit, patients completed the Asthma Control Diary every morning and evening. Concordance between the questionnaire and diary was high (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] = 0.87). Both reliability (ICC: questionnaire = 0.90; diary = 0.86) and responsiveness (responsiveness index: questionnaire = 1.06; diary = 0.90; p = 0.005) were better with the questionnaire than with the diary. Correlations between the two instruments and other measures of clinical asthma status were similar and close to a priori predictions. Both the Asthma Control Questionnaire and the Asthma Control Diary are valid instruments for measuring asthma control, but the questionnaire has slightly better discriminative and evaluative measurement properties than does the diary.

摘要

每日症状、呼气峰值流速(PEFR)和用药日记常用于哮喘治疗的临床试验,其前提是它们比在诊所完成的问卷能更好地评估临床状况。我们开展了一项研究,旨在比较诊所完成的哮喘控制问卷与哮喘控制日记的测量特性。日记包含的问题和回答选项与问卷几乎相同,但使用PEFR而非FEV(1)作为气道管径的测量指标。在一项观察性研究中,50名有症状的成年哮喘患者在第0、1、5和9周时前往麦克马斯特大学哮喘诊所,完成哮喘控制问卷及其他哮喘状况测量。在每次随访前的1周内,患者每天早晚完成哮喘控制日记。问卷与日记之间的一致性较高(组内相关系数[ICC]=0.87)。问卷的可靠性(ICC:问卷=0.90;日记=0.86)和反应性(反应性指数:问卷=1.06;日记=0.90;p=0.005)均优于日记。两种工具与其他临床哮喘状况测量指标之间的相关性相似,且接近先验预测。哮喘控制问卷和哮喘控制日记都是评估哮喘控制的有效工具,但问卷的判别和评估测量特性略优于日记。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验