• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

择期剖宫产硬膜外麻醉与脊髓麻醉产妇满意度的比较。

Comparison of maternal satisfaction between epidural and spinal anesthesia for elective Cesarean section.

作者信息

Morgan P J, Halpern S, Lam-McCulloch J

机构信息

Department of Anesthesia, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Can J Anaesth. 2000 Oct;47(10):956-61. doi: 10.1007/BF03024865.

DOI:10.1007/BF03024865
PMID:11032269
Abstract

PURPOSE

Epidural anesthesia was a commonly used technique for elective Cesarean section. Recently, because of the availability of non-cutting spinal needles, many institutions have changed from epidural to spinal anesthesia. The purpose of this study was to compare maternal satisfaction between epidural and spinal anesthesia for elective Cesarean section with a new satisfaction tool.

METHODS

We studied healthy parturients in a randomized, double-blinded pilot study in which patients were assigned to receive either epidural (n = 13) or spinal (n = 14) anesthesia for elective Cesarean section. Two and 24 hr postoperatively, patients completed a validated 22-point maternal satisfaction questionnaire and a 10-cm visual analog score (VAS) for satisfaction. Maternal satisfaction scores were compared between groups.

RESULTS

There was no difference in demographics, complications or technical failures between groups. Mean satisfaction scores on the questionnaire (0-154) at two and 24 hr were 130.23 +/- 11.36 and 129.54 +/- 16.70 for the epidural group and 116.92 +/- 18.47 and 115.92 +/- 15.71 for the spinal group (P = 0.04 and P = 0.03 respectively). No difference in VAS scores was noted. The presence of minor side effects including pruritus contributed to the lower satisfaction in the spinal group at 24 hr.

CONCLUSION

This pilot study demonstrated higher maternal satisfaction with epidural than with spinal anesthesia for elective Cesarean section. This may be related to the increased side effects caused by neuraxial morphine. The satisfaction questionnaire was able to elucidate differences not detected with a global VAS for satisfaction. Further study with a larger patient population is required to confirm these data.

摘要

目的

硬膜外麻醉是择期剖宫产常用的技术。近来,由于无切割脊麻针的应用,许多机构已从硬膜外麻醉改为脊麻。本研究的目的是使用一种新的满意度工具比较硬膜外麻醉与脊麻用于择期剖宫产时产妇的满意度。

方法

我们在一项随机、双盲的前瞻性研究中研究了健康产妇,这些产妇被分配接受硬膜外麻醉(n = 13)或脊麻(n = 14)以进行择期剖宫产。术后2小时和24小时,患者完成一份经过验证的22分产妇满意度问卷和一个10厘米的视觉模拟评分(VAS)以评估满意度。比较两组产妇的满意度得分。

结果

两组在人口统计学、并发症或技术失败方面无差异。硬膜外组术后2小时和24小时问卷的平均满意度得分(0 - 154)分别为130.23±11.36和129.54±16.70,脊麻组分别为116.92±18.47和115.92±15.71(分别P = 0.04和P = 0.03)。VAS评分无差异。包括瘙痒在内的轻微副作用的出现导致脊麻组在24小时时满意度较低。

结论

这项前瞻性研究表明,择期剖宫产时产妇对硬膜外麻醉的满意度高于脊麻。这可能与鞘内注射吗啡引起的副作用增加有关。满意度问卷能够阐明总体VAS满意度未检测到的差异。需要对更多患者进行进一步研究以证实这些数据。

相似文献

1
Comparison of maternal satisfaction between epidural and spinal anesthesia for elective Cesarean section.择期剖宫产硬膜外麻醉与脊髓麻醉产妇满意度的比较。
Can J Anaesth. 2000 Oct;47(10):956-61. doi: 10.1007/BF03024865.
2
Maternal satisfaction to epidural and spinal anesthesia for cesarean section.剖宫产硬膜外麻醉和脊髓麻醉的产妇满意度
J Med Assoc Thai. 2004 Jun;87(6):628-35.
3
A randomized trial of maximum cephalad sensory blockade with single-shot spinal compared with combined spinal-epidural techniques for cesarean delivery.单次脊麻最大头端感觉阻滞与腰麻-硬膜外联合技术用于剖宫产的随机试验。
Anesth Analg. 2009 Jan;108(1):240-5. doi: 10.1213/ane.0b013e31818e0fa6.
4
Subarachnoid fentanyl augments lidocaine spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery.蛛网膜下腔注射芬太尼增强利多卡因用于剖宫产的脊髓麻醉效果。
Reg Anesth. 1995 Sep-Oct;20(5):389-94.
5
A randomized trial comparing low-dose combined spinal-epidural anesthesia and conventional epidural anesthesia for cesarean section in severe preeclampsia.一项比较低剂量腰麻-硬膜外联合麻醉与传统硬膜外麻醉用于重度子痫前期剖宫产的随机试验。
Acta Anaesthesiol Belg. 2005;56(2):155-62.
6
Combined spinal epidural causes higher level of block than equivalent single-shot spinal anesthesia in elective cesarean patients.在择期剖宫产患者中,腰麻-硬膜外联合麻醉产生的阻滞平面高于等效单次腰麻。
Anesth Analg. 2006 Feb;102(2):577-80. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000195440.51717.37.
7
A randomized comparison of low doses of hyperbaric bupivacaine in combined spinal-epidural anesthesia for cesarean delivery.低剂量高压布比卡因用于剖宫产腰麻-硬膜外联合麻醉的随机对照研究。
Anesth Analg. 2009 Nov;109(5):1600-5. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3181b72d35.
8
Comparison of the maternal and neonatal effects of epidural block and of combined spinal-epidural block for Cesarean section.剖宫产硬膜外阻滞与腰麻-硬膜外联合阻滞对母婴影响的比较。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2005 Jul 1;121(1):18-23. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2004.08.017.
9
Ultra-low dose combined spinal-epidural anesthesia with intrathecal bupivacaine 3.75 mg for cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial.超低剂量腰麻-硬膜外联合麻醉复合鞘内注射3.75 mg布比卡因用于剖宫产:一项随机对照试验
Int J Obstet Anesth. 2006 Oct;15(4):273-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2006.03.004. Epub 2006 Jun 13.
10
Nitrous oxide anxiolysis for elective cesarean section.择期剖宫产的氧化亚氮镇静作用
J Clin Anesth. 2005 Nov;17(7):543-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2005.01.009.

引用本文的文献

1
Effect of epidural dexmedetomidine in single-dose combined with ropivacaine for cesarean section.硬膜外单次给予右美托咪定联合罗哌卡因用于剖宫产的效果。
BMC Anesthesiol. 2024 Apr 8;24(1):134. doi: 10.1186/s12871-024-02519-4.
2
Ultrasound-guided caudal anaesthesia combined with epidural anaesthesia for caesarean section: a randomized controlled clinical trial.超声引导下骶管阻滞联合硬膜外麻醉用于剖宫产术:一项随机对照临床试验。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2024 Feb 2;24(1):105. doi: 10.1186/s12884-024-06298-1.
3
Metoclopramide and Propofol to Prevent Nausea and Vomiting during Cesarean Section under Spinal Anesthesia: A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind Trial.
甲氧氯普胺与丙泊酚预防脊髓麻醉下剖宫产术中恶心呕吐的随机、安慰剂对照、双盲试验
J Clin Med. 2021 Dec 26;11(1):110. doi: 10.3390/jcm11010110.
4
Factors associated with anesthetic satisfaction after cesarean delivery under neuraxial anesthesia.剖宫产腰麻下麻醉满意度的相关因素
JA Clin Rep. 2018 Sep 10;4(1):66. doi: 10.1186/s40981-018-0206-x.
5
[Recent standards in management of obstetric anesthesia].[产科麻醉管理的最新标准]
Wien Med Wochenschr. 2017 Nov;167(15-16):374-389. doi: 10.1007/s10354-017-0584-0. Epub 2017 Jul 25.
6
Premedication with midazolam prior to cesarean delivery in preeclamptic parturients: A randomized controlled trial.子痫前期产妇剖宫产术前使用咪达唑仑进行预处理:一项随机对照试验。
Anesth Essays Res. 2016 Sep-Dec;10(3):631-636. doi: 10.4103/0259-1162.191117.
7
Measures of satisfaction with care during labour and birth: a comparative review.分娩期间护理满意度的衡量标准:比较综述。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2013 May 8;13:108. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-13-108.
8
Perception of anesthesia safety and postoperative symptoms of surgery patients in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam: a pioneering trial of postoperative care assessment in a developing nation.越南胡志明市手术患者对麻醉安全性和术后症状的感知:发展中国家术后护理评估的开创性试验。
Environ Health Prev Med. 2010 Nov;15(6):333-43. doi: 10.1007/s12199-010-0148-z. Epub 2010 May 8.
9
Toward the validation of visual analogue scale for anxiety.迈向焦虑视觉模拟量表的验证。
Anesth Prog. 2011 Spring;58(1):8-13. doi: 10.2344/0003-3006-58.1.8.
10
Spinal versus epidural anaesthesia for caesarean section.剖宫产的脊髓麻醉与硬膜外麻醉
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004;2004(2):CD003765. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003765.pub2.