• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

分娩期间护理满意度的衡量标准:比较综述。

Measures of satisfaction with care during labour and birth: a comparative review.

机构信息

School of Health Sciences, City University London, 20 Bartholomew Close, London, UK.

出版信息

BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2013 May 8;13:108. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-13-108.

DOI:10.1186/1471-2393-13-108
PMID:23656701
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3659073/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Satisfaction is the one of the most frequently reported outcome measures for quality of care. Assessment of satisfaction with maternity services is crucial, and psychometrically sound measures are needed if this is to inform health practices. This paper comparatively reviews current measures of satisfaction with care during labour and birth.

METHODS

A review of the literature was conducted. Studies were located through computerised databases and hand searching references of identified articles and reviews. Inclusion criteria were that the questionnaire was a multi-item scale of satisfaction with care during labour and birth, and some form of psychometric information (either information about questionnaire construction, or reliability, or validity) had to be reported.

RESULTS

Nine questionnaires of satisfaction with care during labour and birth were identified. Instruments varied in psychometric properties and dimensions. Most described questionnaire construction and tested some form of reliability and validity. Measures were generally not based on the main theoretical models of satisfaction and varied in scope and application to different types of samples (e.g. satisfaction following caesarean section). For an in-depth measure of satisfaction with intrapartum care, the Intrapartal-Specific Quality from the Patient's Perspective questionnaire (QPP-I) is recommended. Brief measures with good reliability and validity are provided by the Six Simple Questions (SSQ) or Perceptions of Care Adjective Checklist (PCACL-R).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the interest in measures of satisfaction there are only a small number of validated measures of satisfaction with care during labour and birth. It is important that brief, reliable and valid measures are available for use in general and specific populations in order to assist research and inform practice.

摘要

背景

满意度是最常报告的护理质量结果之一。评估对产妇护理的满意度至关重要,如果要告知卫生实践,则需要具有心理测量学依据的测量方法。本文比较了目前评估分娩期间护理满意度的方法。

方法

对文献进行了综述。通过计算机数据库和手工搜索已确定文章和综述的参考文献来定位研究。纳入标准是问卷是一种多项目分娩期间护理满意度量表,并且必须报告某种形式的心理测量信息(无论是有关问卷构建的信息,还是可靠性或有效性)。

结果

确定了 9 种评估分娩期间护理满意度的问卷。这些工具在心理测量特性和维度上存在差异。大多数描述了问卷的构建,并测试了某种形式的可靠性和有效性。这些措施通常不是基于满意度的主要理论模型,其范围和应用也有所不同,适用于不同类型的样本(例如剖宫产术后的满意度)。对于深入评估分娩期间护理满意度,建议使用从患者角度出发的产时特定质量问卷(QPP-I)。简短且具有良好可靠性和有效性的措施有 6 个简单问题(SSQ)或护理感知形容词检查表(PCACL-R)。

结论

尽管对满意度的测量方法很感兴趣,但只有少数经过验证的分娩期间护理满意度的测量方法。重要的是,为了协助研究和告知实践,需要有简短、可靠且有效的方法来适用于一般人群和特定人群。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f580/3659073/16ffee118a80/1471-2393-13-108-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f580/3659073/16ffee118a80/1471-2393-13-108-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f580/3659073/16ffee118a80/1471-2393-13-108-1.jpg

相似文献

1
Measures of satisfaction with care during labour and birth: a comparative review.分娩期间护理满意度的衡量标准:比较综述。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2013 May 8;13:108. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-13-108.
2
Validity of instruments for measuring the satisfaction of a woman and her partner with care received during labour and childbirth: Systematic review.测量女性及其伴侣对分娩期间所接受护理满意度的工具的有效性:系统评价
Midwifery. 2017 Dec;55:103-112. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2017.09.014. Epub 2017 Sep 21.
3
Development and psychometric testing of the scales for measuring maternal satisfaction in normal and caesarean birth.测量正常分娩和剖宫产产妇满意度的量表的编制及心理测量学检验。
Midwifery. 2012 Jun;28(3):348-57. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2011.03.009. Epub 2011 May 4.
4
The Spanish version of the Childbirth Experience Questionnaire (CEQ-E): reliability and validity assessment.《分娩体验问卷》西班牙语版(CEQ-E):信度与效度评估
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2016 Nov 24;16(1):372. doi: 10.1186/s12884-016-1100-z.
5
The birth satisfaction scale: Igbo adaptation, validation, and reliability study.分娩满意度量表:伊博语改编、验证及信度研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2024 Dec 28;24(1):876. doi: 10.1186/s12884-024-07104-8.
6
Validation of a perceptions of care adjective checklist.护理感知形容词清单的验证
J Eval Clin Pract. 2009 Apr;15(2):281-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2008.00995.x.
7
The Birth Satisfaction Scale-Revised Indicator (BSS-RI).出生满意度量表修订指标(BSS-RI)。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017 Aug 29;17(1):277. doi: 10.1186/s12884-017-1459-5.
8
Assessment and support during early labour for improving birth outcomes.分娩早期的评估与支持以改善分娩结局
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Apr 20;4(4):CD011516. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011516.pub2.
9
Women's experiences of maternity care in England: preliminary development of a standard measure.英国女性的孕产护理体验:标准测量方法的初步制定。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019 May 14;19(1):167. doi: 10.1186/s12884-019-2284-9.
10
Intrapartum care could be improved according to Swedish fathers: mode of birth matters for satisfaction.根据瑞典父亲的说法,分娩期护理可以得到改善:分娩方式对满意度很重要。
Women Birth. 2013 Sep;26(3):195-201. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2013.04.001. Epub 2013 May 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Translation and validation of the Birth Satisfaction Scale-Revised Indicator (BSS-RI) in Chinese.中文版分娩满意度量表修订指标(BSS-RI)的翻译与验证
Sci Rep. 2025 Sep 2;15(1):32289. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-17614-w.
2
Assessing the Perceived Attitude of Nurses towards Childbirth: Experiences of Rural Childbearing Women in Kwara State, Nigeria.评估护士对分娩的认知态度:尼日利亚夸拉州农村育龄妇女的经历
Ethiop J Health Sci. 2025 Mar;35(2):115-124. doi: 10.4314/ejhs.v35i2.8.
3
Evaluating women's experiences and satisfaction with labour induction in India: a comparison of the participant generated experience and satisfaction (PaGES) index with standard methods.

本文引用的文献

1
Parents' experiences and satisfaction with care during the birth of their very preterm baby: a qualitative study.父母在极低出生体重儿出生期间的护理体验和满意度:一项定性研究。
BJOG. 2013 Apr;120(5):637-43. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.12104. Epub 2013 Jan 4.
2
The assessment of satisfaction with care in the perinatal period.围产期护理满意度评估。
J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol. 2012 Jun;33(2):37-44. doi: 10.3109/0167482X.2012.658464.
3
The relationship between prenatal control, expectations, experienced control, and birth satisfaction among primiparous women.
评估印度女性引产的经历和满意度:将参与者生成的经历与满意度(PaGES)指数与标准方法进行比较。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2025 May 28;25(1):619. doi: 10.1186/s12884-025-07731-9.
4
Adaptation and validation of the Polish version of the Quality from Patient Perspective-Intrapartal (QPP-I) questionnaire to assess childbirth care.从患者角度评估分娩护理的波兰版《分娩期质量视角问卷》(QPP-I)的改编与验证
Eur J Midwifery. 2025 May 12;9. doi: 10.18332/ejm/201472. eCollection 2025.
5
The Childbirth Experience of Pregnant Women Living with HIV Virus.感染艾滋病毒孕妇的分娩经历
J Clin Med. 2025 Mar 14;14(6):1975. doi: 10.3390/jcm14061975.
6
Effect of using a birth ball on birth satisfaction and pain in pregnant women during labor: a randomized controlled trial.分娩时使用分娩球对孕妇分娩满意度及疼痛的影响:一项随机对照试验
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2024 Dec;310(6):2999-3007. doi: 10.1007/s00404-024-07825-3. Epub 2024 Nov 25.
7
Comparing birth experiences and satisfaction with midwifery care before and after the implementation of Canada's first Alongside Midwifery Unit (AMU).比较加拿大首个陪伴分娩单位(AMU)实施前后的分娩经历和对助产士护理的满意度。
PLoS One. 2024 Aug 21;19(8):e0306916. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0306916. eCollection 2024.
8
The Childbirth Experiences of Pregnant Women Living with HIV Virus: Scoping Review.感染艾滋病毒的孕妇的分娩经历:范围综述
Children (Basel). 2024 Jun 18;11(6):743. doi: 10.3390/children11060743.
9
Maternal satisfaction on delivery service and associated factors among mothers delivered at Arba Minch town governmental health facilities, South Ethiopia: A cross-sectional study.埃塞俄比亚南部阿尔巴米琴镇政府卫生设施分娩母亲对分娩服务的满意度及相关因素:一项横断面研究。
SAGE Open Med. 2024 May 8;12:20503121241247995. doi: 10.1177/20503121241247995. eCollection 2024.
10
Key dimensions of women's and their partners' experiences of childbirth: A systematic review of reviews of qualitative studies.女性及其伴侣分娩体验的关键维度:定性研究系统评价综述。
PLoS One. 2024 Mar 29;19(3):e0299151. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0299151. eCollection 2024.
初产妇产前控制、期望、体验控制与分娩满意度的关系。
Midwifery. 2012 Feb;28(1):39-44. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2010.10.013. Epub 2011 Apr 1.
4
The birth satisfaction scale.分娩满意度量表。
Int J Health Care Qual Assur. 2011;24(2):124-35. doi: 10.1108/09526861111105086.
5
Birthgiving women's feelings and perceptions of quality of intrapartal care: a nationwide Swedish cross-sectional study.分娩妇女对产时护理质量的感受和看法:一项全国性的瑞典横断面研究。
J Clin Nurs. 2011 Apr;20(7-8):1168-77. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2010.03393.x. Epub 2011 Feb 9.
6
Womens' opinions on intrapartal care: development of a theory-based questionnaire.产妇对产时护理的意见:基于理论的问卷开发。
J Clin Nurs. 2010 Jun;19(11-12):1748-60. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2009.03055.x.
7
A simple tool to measure patient perceptions of operative birth.一种简单的工具,用于测量患者对手术分娩的感知。
BJOG. 2009 Dec;116(13):1755-61. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2009.02363.x. Epub 2009 Sep 23.
8
Assessment of quality of midwifery care in labour and delivery wards of selected Kordestan Medical Science University hospitals.库尔德斯坦医科大学部分附属医院产房及分娩室助产护理质量评估
Int J Health Care Qual Assur. 2009;22(3):266-77. doi: 10.1108/09526860910953539.
9
Systematic review of questionnaires measuring patient satisfaction in ambulatory anesthesia.测量门诊麻醉患者满意度的问卷的系统评价
Anesthesiology. 2009 May;110(5):1061-7. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e31819db079.
10
Validation of a perceptions of care adjective checklist.护理感知形容词清单的验证
J Eval Clin Pract. 2009 Apr;15(2):281-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2008.00995.x.